Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology †Free Samples

Question: Talk about the Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. Answer: Intrtoduction: This paper puts accentuation on the three parts of how mental issue are seen by the average citizens, by their own and by the clinicians. Biogenetic depictions are identified with trashing perspective of the general public. Nonetheless, the discoveries from the co-social just as the test assessments recommends that biogenetics portrayals really partner to diminish the propensity to censure the people with mental clutters for their own issues however a growing inclination to see them as undermining and flighty. The blended endowments model has been portrayed which accentuation primarily on the clarification of biogenetics and further branches to attribution of wildness and mental essentialism. Attribution of wildness was further clarifying the reduced fault and then again, mental essentialism clarifies want for social separation, prognostic negativity and saw peril for the intellectually scattered. Consequently on the off chance that the impediments are to be thought of, at that point it very well may be said that nobody can divert their back from confronting the reactions of the biogenetic standpoint to the psychopathology. What should be possible is to battle essentialist misinterpretations of neuroscience and mental hereditary qualities that can lead an approach to isolate the biogenetic portrayals and the current disfavor. Finally, the unsuitable impacts of the biogenetic clarifications can be changed by basically instructing the general public on bioscience. To dispose of the adverse generalizations that the general public has for the individuals with emotional wellness issues both the unmistakable outcomes of biogenetic and psychosocial depictions of mental indications are surveyed in this article. It was in New Zealand that the negative observations were that are found somewhere else are reproduced here. In any case, it has been seen that the wellbeing experts of Australia are progressively negative towards the intellectually sick then the regular open. Destigmatization battles attempts to cause general society to follow that individuals experiencing seriously troublesome mental issues are sick similarly as the person who is enduring with some ailment. The chose test for this specific examination is undergrad science understudies from a college of New Zealand. In any case, two polls for every member were made before hand and they were made to watch a video where an intellectually hostility depict their manifestations. Not long when thi s video the members need to fill this survey, which will quantify their demeanor towards the intellectually crippled. All things were scored so that the higher the quantity of score the portrayal of the negative mentality will likewise be higher. In any case, this investigation guarantees that New Zealand as barely any different Nationalities confine certain negative perspectives for the intellectually sick. In this article, it has been discovered that the disgrace identified with the dysfunctional behaviors impedes the treatment utilized and this may additionally decline the effectively impressive social just as mental weight that has been forced by manifestations of psychological maladjustment. In spite of the fact that there has been a tremendous rehashed endeavors that has been taken to diminish the shame of psychological sicknesses, in this manner the negative mentality has been proceeded or have exacerbate the cases over the most recent ten years of time. Surveys on this subject in the past has just evaluated that various legendary constraints are there that are seen as hosing the advancement in this circle. From this article, there are sure extra issues that are identified with costly disgrace lessening points of view, heterogeneous foundations and excessively constrained inquiries identified with this examination has been talked about in a careful way. Be that as it may, here are sure proposals that are accommodated again centering this circle of work by broadening the inquiries identified with this exploration, starting evident builds and by including certain desert however significant investigation from the populaces. The result of this article further tends to the reasonable difficulties in the exploration of dysfunctional behavior shame that can assist with ad libbing the aims and in a superior manner serve the individuals experiencing mental anguish. The motivation behind this article it has been expected that the biogenetic irregular models can generally extemporize the open perspectives towards the people experiencing dysfunctional behaviors. It anyway analyzes that attributions of biogenetics are related emphatically with the grasping of those people who are enduring by these sorts of disarranges. For this specific point, there has been a review in the populace that was led in two major urban areas of Germany. The respondents were offered with a delineation of youthful females who are experiencing anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa that has been trailed by a full-sorted out meeting that remembers the inquiries for easygoing attributions, the enthusiastic responses of the members and the desire for social separation. The outcome further expresses that attribution to the genetic components shows barely any relationship with mentalities in regards to people who goes with the manifestations of dietary issue. Further expressing th at the members who are supporting cerebrum illnesses as a cause that is tended more to grasp those burdened that are liable for the conditions. Be that as it may, the members were seen as progressively inclined to negative feelings and have a more grounded preference for social separation. Along these lines, the thought has not been bolstered that biogenetic easygoing models of dietary issues to diminish the disgrace but instead it can build the danger of involving it. References Angermeyer, M. C., Mnich, E., Daubmann, A., Herich, L., Wegscheider, K., Kofahl, C., von dem Knesebeck, O. (2013). Biogenetic clarifications and open acknowledgment of individuals with eating disorders.Social psychiatry and mental epidemiology,48(10), 1667-1673. Casados, A. T. (2017). Decreasing the Stigma of Mental Illness: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. Haslam, N., Kvaale, E. P. (2015).Biogenetic clarifications of mental issue: The blended favors model.Current Directions in Psychological Science,24(5), 399-404. Walker, I., Read, J. (2002).The differential adequacy of psychosocial and biogenetic causal clarifications in decreasing contrary perspectives toward mental illness.Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes,65(4), 313-325.

The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ Chapter 2 Free Essays

‘Oh, yes. He needs us to return and reveal to him where to discover you, so he can ensure the kid is safe.’ ‘If I were you,’ said Joseph, ‘I’d go straight home. We will compose a custom paper test on The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ Chapter 2 or on the other hand any comparable subject just for you Request Now The lord is unusual, you know. He may bring it into his head to rebuff you. We’ll take the kid to him in great time, don’t worry.’ The stargazers thought this was a word of wisdom, and went their direction. In the interim, Joseph stuffed their merchandise hurriedly, and set off that very night with Mary and the youngsters and went to Egypt, since he knew King Herod’s unpredictable ways, and dreaded what he would do. The Death of Zacharias He was on the whole correct to do as such. At the point when Herod understood that the crystal gazers were not going to return, he flew into a wrath and requested that each kid in Bethlehem and the area under two years old ought to be murdered without a moment's delay. One of the offspring of the correct age was John, the child of Zacharias and Elizabeth. When they knew about Herod’s plan, Elizabeth took him up into the mountains searching for some place to stow away. In any case, she was old and couldn't walk far, and in her depression she shouted out, ‘Oh pile of God, cover a mother and her child!’ Without a moment's delay the mountain opened and offered her a collapse which to shield. So she and the kid were sheltered, however Zacharias was in a tough situation. Herod realized that he had as of late fathered a youngster, and sent for him. ‘Where is your kid? Where have you covered up him?’ ‘I am a bustling minister, Your Majesty! I invest all my energy about the matter of the sanctuary! Taking care of youngsters is women’s work. I don’t know where my child can be.’ ‘I caution you ?C come clean! I can threaten your wellbeing in the event that I need to.’ ‘If you shed my blood, I will be a saint to the Lord,’ said Zacharias, and that worked out as expected, on the grounds that he was executed there and afterward. The Childhood of Jesus In the mean time, Joseph and Mary were choosing what to call their children. The firstborn was to be named Jesus, yet what to call the other, Mary’s mystery top pick? At long last they gave him a typical name, yet taking into account what the shepherds had stated, Mary consistently called him Christ, which is Greek for Messiah. Jesus was a solid and sprightly child, however Christ was regularly sick, and Mary stressed over him, and gave him the hottest covers, and let him suck nectar from at the tip of her finger to stop him crying. Not long after they had shown up in Egypt, Joseph heard that King Herod had kicked the bucket. It was sheltered to return to Palestine, thus they set off back to Joseph’s home in Nazareth in Galilee. There the youngsters grew up. Also, as opportunity went there arrived more kids to go along with them, more siblings, and sisters as well. Mary cherished every one of her kids, however not similarly. The little Christ appeared to her to require exceptional consideration. Where Jesus and different kids were rowdy and played boisterously together, getting into evil, taking organic product, yelling out impolite names and fleeing, starting ruckuses, tossing stones, smearing mud on house dividers, getting sparrows, Christ clung to his mother’s skirts and went through hours in perusing and petition. One day Mary went to the place of a neighbor who was a dyer. Jesus and Christ both accompanied her, and keeping in mind that she was conversing with the dyer, with Christ near to her side, Jesus went into the workshop. He took a gander at all the vessels containing diverse shaded colors, and dunked a finger in every one, and afterward cleaned them on the heap of fabrics standing by to be colored. At that point he imagined that the dyer would see and be furious with him, so he packaged up the whole heap and push everything into the vessel containing a dark color. He returned to the room where his mom was conversing with the dyer, and Christ saw him and stated, ‘Mama, Jesus has accomplished something wrong.’ Jesus had his hands behind him. ‘Show me your hands,’ said Mary. He brought his hands around to appear. They were shaded dark, red, yellow, purple and blue. ‘What have you been doing?’ she said. Frightened, the dyer ran into his workshop. Protruding out of the highest point of the vessel with the dark color was a chaotic load of material, besmeared and recolored with dark, and with different hues also. ‘Oh no! Look what this whelp has done!’ he cried. ‘All this material ?C it’ll cost me a fortune!’ ‘Jesus, you terrible boy!’ said Mary. ‘Look, you’ve annihilated this man’s work! We’ll need to pay for it. How might we do that?’ ‘But I thought I was helping,’ said Jesus. ‘Mama,’ said Christ, ‘I can make everything better.’ Furthermore, he took an edge of fabric, and said to the dyer: ‘What shading is this one expected to be, sir?’ ‘Red,’ said the dyer. Furthermore, the kid hauled it out of the vessel, and it was red everywhere. At that point he pulled out every one of the rest of the materials, asking the dyer what shading it ought to be, thus they were: each piece was consummately colored similarly as the client had requested it. The dyer wondered, and Mary grasped the youngster Christ and kissed him over and over, loaded up with satisfaction at the decency of the little individual. Some other time Jesus was playing close to the passage over a creek, and he made some little sparrows out of mud and set them all up in succession. A devout Jew who was passing observed what he was doing and went to tell Joseph. ‘Your child has broken the sabbath!’ he said. ‘Do you know what he’s doing somewhere around the passage? You should control your children!’ Joseph rushed to perceive what Jesus was doing. Christ had heard the man yelling, and followed not far behind Joseph. Others were following as well, having heard the uproar. They arrived similarly as Jesus made the twelfth sparrow. ‘Jesus!’ Joseph said. ‘Stop that without a moment's delay. You realize this is the sabbath.’ They would rebuff Jesus, however Christ applauded, and without a moment's delay the sparrows woke up and took off. The individuals were astonished. ‘I didn’t need my sibling to get into trouble,’ Christ clarified. ‘He’s a decent kid really.’ And all the grown-ups were loaded up with adoration. The young man was so unobtrusive and mindful, not somewhat like his sibling. However, the offspring of the town favored Jesus. The Visit to Jerusalem At the point when the twins were twelve years of age, Joseph and Mary took them to Jerusalem for the banquet of the Passover. They went down in an organization of different families, and there were numerous grown-ups to watch out for the kids. After the celebration, when they were assembling everybody to leave, Mary ensured that Christ was with her, and said to him: ‘Where is Jesus? I can’t see him anywhere.’ ‘I think he’s with the group of Zachaeus,’ said Christ. ‘He was playing with Simon and Jude. He disclosed to me he was going to travel home with them.’ So they set off, and Mary and Joseph pondered him, envisioning him safe with the other family. Be that as it may, when it was the ideal opportunity for the night feast, Mary sent Christ to Zachaeus’s family to call Jesus, and he returned energized and restless. ‘He’s not with them! He revealed to me he was going to play with them, however he never did! They haven’t seen him anywhere!’ Mary and Joseph looked among their family members and companions, and solicited each gathering from voyagers in the event that they had seen Jesus, however none of them knew where he was. This one said they had last observed him playing outside the sanctuary, that one said they had heard him state he was setting off to the commercial center, another said they were certain he was with Thomas, or Saul, or Jacob. At long last Joseph and Mary needed to acknowledge that he had been abandoned, and they stashed their things and turned around towards Jerusalem. Christ rode on the jackass, since Mary was stressed that he may be worn out. They scanned through the city for three days, however Jesus was mysteriously absent. At long last Christ stated, ‘Mama, should we go to the sanctuary and appeal to God for him?’ Since they had looked wherever else, they figured they would attempt that. Also, when they entered the sanctuary grounds, they heard a disturbance. ‘That’ll be him,’ said Joseph. Sufficiently sure, it was. The clerics had discovered Jesus wiping his name on the divider with earth, and were concluding how to rebuff him. ‘It’s just clay!’ he was stating, forgetting about the earth his hands. ‘As soon as it downpours, it’ll fall off once more! I wouldn’t fantasy about harming the sanctuary. I was composing my name there with the expectation that God would see it and recollect me.’ ‘Blasphemer!’ said a minister. What's more, he would have struck Jesus, yet Christ ventured forward and talked. ‘Please, sir,’ he stated, ‘my sibling isn't a blasphemer. He was composing his name in mud to communicate the expressions of Job, â€Å"Remember that you molded me like mud; and will you go me to clean again?† ‘ ‘That may be,’ said another, ‘but he realizes without a doubt he’s fouled up. Look ?C he’s attempted to wash his hands and disguise the evidence.’ ‘Well, obviously he has,’ said Christ. ‘He has done it to satisfy the expressions of Jeremiah, â€Å"Though you wash yourself with lye and utilize a lot of cleanser, the stain of your blame is still before you.†Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ ‘But to flee from your family!’ Mary said to Jesus. ‘We’ve been unnerved! Anything could have transpired. Be that as it may, you’re so narrow minded, you don’t realize thinking of others. Your family makes no difference to you!’ Jesus hung his head. Yet, Christ stated: ‘No, Mama, I’m sure he has good intentions. A

3 Proven Strategies to Motivate Your Team - Focus

3 Proven Strategies to Motivate Your Team - Focus Its a fresh battle every day to find the motivation to get through my to do list. But motivating your team is an entirely different challenge. Its not always as simple as cracking the whip or offering a cash bonus, either. Understanding how people respond to different types of motivation can help us be better leaders and increase the productivity of our teams. It can just take a little science to figure out what works best and which strategies to use to motivate your team. 1. Show Appreciation This first approach sounds simple, but it can make a big difference. In a survey of 2,000 working Americans, 81 percent said theyd work harder for an appreciative boss. 70 percent also said theyd feel better about themselves and their work if their boss showed appreciation more often. For a simple thanks, thats quite a good returnâ€"even if it only leads to a small increase in productivity, its worth the effort. According to Wharton professor Adam Grant, A sense of appreciation is the single most sustainable motivator at work. Grant says appreciation differs from motivators like cash bonuses or promotions, which we quickly adjust to, because the sense that other people appreciate what you do sticks with you. A review of over fifty studies from the London School of Economics in 2011 backs up the benefits of showing appreciation for your team. The review found people put in more effort at work when they feel appreciated. Another example of this effect at work comes from behavioral economist Dan Ariely, who conducted an experiment on motivation at an Intel factory in Israel. The study split employees into groups and told each group theyd receive a different reward for completing all their work each day. One group would receive a small cash bonus, another would receive a voucher for free pizza, and a third would receive a compliment from the boss. On the first day, the pizza group was most productive, with the compliment group a close second. The cash bonus group had a small bump in productivity compared to the control group (who received no bonus reward) but was far behind the pizza and compliment conditions. And on the second day of the study, the cash bonus group actually performed worse than those employees not receiving any reward. As the week finished up, productivity leveled out across all three conditions, but compliments ended up as the best option for boosting the workers performance. This study points out how little money can motivate us, and how, in fact, it can even harm our motivation. But another study showed that when we dont feel our work is appreciated, we tend to expect more money as compensation for the same work. So take some time to say thank you to your team members today. That quick act could save you money and increase productivity. Discover team productivity Try MeisterTask Its free! Try MeisterTask 2. Show Your Team the Fruits of Their Labor Research shows we like to see the outcome of our efforts. An example comes from a study that asked participants to build Lego models, paying a small sum per model that decreased for each one the participants completed. For some participants, the models were immediately disassembled by the researchers. For the rest, their models were kept under the table to be disassembled at the end of the experiment. The team whose work was kept until they were done completed an average of eleven Lego models before quitting, while those whose models were immediately disassembled only managed seven. Even though both groups of participants knew their work would ultimately be destroyed, seeing the fruits of their labor was enough to encourage participants to keep working for longer. A less tangible example comes from a study of a fundraising call center at the University of Michigan. Call center workers were visited by students who had benefited from the centers efforts, for a ten-minute chat. A month later researchers found that those workers whod been spoken to by students were spending 142 percent longer on the phone, and overall the centers income had increased by 171 percent. Even if your team isnt creating something tangible like Lego models, there are ways you can show them the outcomes theyre contributing to. Seeing how their efforts lead to a meaningful result could motivate your team to work harder. 3. Motivate Your Team by Putting Something at Stake We like to get new things, but we hate losing things even more. This principle is called loss aversion. Were so averse to loss that well go a long way to avoid it. Vassilis Dalakas, professor of marketing at California State University San Marcos tested how loss aversion could be used to increase his students motivation to study. He taught the same consumer behavior class twice, with the same material, and introduced optional pop quizzes throughout the class in both cases. The quizzes were worth one point if they were passed, and any student with five points at the end of the class could skip the final exam. The only difference between the two classes was the rule around the final exam. In the first class the exam was required, but students could earn the right to opt out by gaining five points from the quizzes. In the second class the exam was optional from the start but students could lose the right to opt out by not gaining five points. Guess which class passed more quizzes? In class one 43 percent of students earned five points by the end of the class. In class two it was 82 percentâ€"almost double. The reason is simply loss aversion. We hate to lose things that we feel belong to us. Its so upsetting that well work harder to maintain our ownership over those things rather than suffer the loss. The students in the second class believed they owned the right to skip the exam and didnt want to have it taken away, so they were more likely to study hard and pass the quizzes. The good news is even small losses work better as motivators than rewards. As we saw in the study above, it’s simply a matter of framing that changes how much we’re motivated to work hard. So you might offer your team the chance to earn an afternoon off by hitting their weekly goals. Or you could promise them an afternoon off every week unless they don’t hit their weekly goals. The outcome is the same, but the framing is different. It seems we care more about not losing something that’s already been promised to us than we do about earning something new. You can combine the various suggestions I’ve explored here to motivate your team. Show your team the fruits of their labor and remember to offer your appreciation for their work, but also try putting something at stake now and then. Each of these approaches has been shown to increase motivation, but together theyre sure to work even better. Teamwork made simple Discover MeisterTask Its free! Discover MeisterTask 3 Proven Strategies to Motivate Your Team - Focus Its a fresh battle every day to find the motivation to get through my to do list. But motivating your team is an entirely different challenge. Its not always as simple as cracking the whip or offering a cash bonus, either. Understanding how people respond to different types of motivation can help us be better leaders and increase the productivity of our teams. It can just take a little science to figure out what works best and which strategies to use to motivate your team. 1. Show Appreciation This first approach sounds simple, but it can make a big difference. In a survey of 2,000 working Americans, 81 percent said theyd work harder for an appreciative boss. 70 percent also said theyd feel better about themselves and their work if their boss showed appreciation more often. For a simple thanks, thats quite a good returnâ€"even if it only leads to a small increase in productivity, its worth the effort. According to Wharton professor Adam Grant, A sense of appreciation is the single most sustainable motivator at work. Grant says appreciation differs from motivators like cash bonuses or promotions, which we quickly adjust to, because the sense that other people appreciate what you do sticks with you. A review of over fifty studies from the London School of Economics in 2011 backs up the benefits of showing appreciation for your team. The review found people put in more effort at work when they feel appreciated. Another example of this effect at work comes from behavioral economist Dan Ariely, who conducted an experiment on motivation at an Intel factory in Israel. The study split employees into groups and told each group theyd receive a different reward for completing all their work each day. One group would receive a small cash bonus, another would receive a voucher for free pizza, and a third would receive a compliment from the boss. On the first day, the pizza group was most productive, with the compliment group a close second. The cash bonus group had a small bump in productivity compared to the control group (who received no bonus reward) but was far behind the pizza and compliment conditions. And on the second day of the study, the cash bonus group actually performed worse than those employees not receiving any reward. As the week finished up, productivity leveled out across all three conditions, but compliments ended up as the best option for boosting the workers performance. This study points out how little money can motivate us, and how, in fact, it can even harm our motivation. But another study showed that when we dont feel our work is appreciated, we tend to expect more money as compensation for the same work. So take some time to say thank you to your team members today. That quick act could save you money and increase productivity. Discover team productivity Try MeisterTask Its free! Try MeisterTask 2. Show Your Team the Fruits of Their Labor Research shows we like to see the outcome of our efforts. An example comes from a study that asked participants to build Lego models, paying a small sum per model that decreased for each one the participants completed. For some participants, the models were immediately disassembled by the researchers. For the rest, their models were kept under the table to be disassembled at the end of the experiment. The team whose work was kept until they were done completed an average of eleven Lego models before quitting, while those whose models were immediately disassembled only managed seven. Even though both groups of participants knew their work would ultimately be destroyed, seeing the fruits of their labor was enough to encourage participants to keep working for longer. A less tangible example comes from a study of a fundraising call center at the University of Michigan. Call center workers were visited by students who had benefited from the centers efforts, for a ten-minute chat. A month later researchers found that those workers whod been spoken to by students were spending 142 percent longer on the phone, and overall the centers income had increased by 171 percent. Even if your team isnt creating something tangible like Lego models, there are ways you can show them the outcomes theyre contributing to. Seeing how their efforts lead to a meaningful result could motivate your team to work harder. 3. Motivate Your Team by Putting Something at Stake We like to get new things, but we hate losing things even more. This principle is called loss aversion. Were so averse to loss that well go a long way to avoid it. Vassilis Dalakas, professor of marketing at California State University San Marcos tested how loss aversion could be used to increase his students motivation to study. He taught the same consumer behavior class twice, with the same material, and introduced optional pop quizzes throughout the class in both cases. The quizzes were worth one point if they were passed, and any student with five points at the end of the class could skip the final exam. The only difference between the two classes was the rule around the final exam. In the first class the exam was required, but students could earn the right to opt out by gaining five points from the quizzes. In the second class the exam was optional from the start but students could lose the right to opt out by not gaining five points. Guess which class passed more quizzes? In class one 43 percent of students earned five points by the end of the class. In class two it was 82 percentâ€"almost double. The reason is simply loss aversion. We hate to lose things that we feel belong to us. Its so upsetting that well work harder to maintain our ownership over those things rather than suffer the loss. The students in the second class believed they owned the right to skip the exam and didnt want to have it taken away, so they were more likely to study hard and pass the quizzes. The good news is even small losses work better as motivators than rewards. As we saw in the study above, it’s simply a matter of framing that changes how much we’re motivated to work hard. So you might offer your team the chance to earn an afternoon off by hitting their weekly goals. Or you could promise them an afternoon off every week unless they don’t hit their weekly goals. The outcome is the same, but the framing is different. It seems we care more about not losing something that’s already been promised to us than we do about earning something new. You can combine the various suggestions I’ve explored here to motivate your team. Show your team the fruits of their labor and remember to offer your appreciation for their work, but also try putting something at stake now and then. Each of these approaches has been shown to increase motivation, but together theyre sure to work even better. Teamwork made simple Discover MeisterTask Its free! Discover MeisterTask

Machiavelli Essay - 953 Words

The Prince MAJOR THEME Machiavelli had a true and abiding love for Florence. He wanted to make Florence great and also find himself a job, as he lost his when the Medici family came into power. He dedicated his book on political science, The Prince, to Lorenzo Medici in the hopes that Lorenzo would be impressed and offer him a job. However, Lorenzo ignored the book and Machiavelli. The Prince is a didactic examination of political power, how to achieve it, maintain it, and expand it. Machiavelli does not take into consideration what is morally right, or amoral, only what is useful and useless. The book is more like a technical manual, and technical manuals only state the facts. The book defines what turns a mere man into a great†¦show more content†¦As Isiah Berlin says in his essay, Machiavelli admired these heroes because they were high-minded, tough, and tough enough to use brutality against the few, to help the public good of the princedom. He especially admired Moses because he was worthy to talk to God. Moses had the opportunity to create a new civilization with the Israelites because they were being treated badly by the Pharoah. Therefore, Moses took advantage of their discontent with their new master and led them in a revolt. Eventually creating a new civilization. Machiavelli admired Moses because of his strength of character that carried him through the difficult trouble of gaining power. 3. Discuss Machiavelliamp;#8217;s opinions on the uses of cruelty to accomplish certain goals. The Prince is about the ways to achieve political power, with no preference for the way in which it is achieved. Machiavelli does not advocate unnecessary cruelty. His book is only about how to obtain and keep a princedom. Machiavelli believes that cruelty is sometimes necessary to aquire or/and keep political power. Machiavelli recognized that in the time he lived a political ruler would have to use cruelty, he writes, amp;#8220;The new prince, above all princes, cannot possibly avoid the name of cruelty;. He also states in Chapter VIII that cruelty may be useful sometimes in achieving certain ends, but it would bring no glory. 1. What doesShow MoreRelated Machiavelli Essay1597 Words   |  7 Pages quot;The term Machiavellian refers to someone who is unscrupulous, cunning, cynical, and unprincipledquot;(Goods 1998). Many scholars agree that this particular adjective would have dismayed Niccolo Machiavelli, the man from whom the term is derived. In reality he has been attributed as being one of the brightest lights of the Italian Renaissance through his works as not only a writer, but also as an influential philosopher of history and political thought. His most famous work The Prince hasRead MoreThe Machiavelli And Machiavelli s The Prince2348 Words   |  10 PagesI have always found great interest in the infamous Niccolo Machiavelli and his ways of thinking; my eye was drawn to him long before I knew I would be studying at Colorado State and even before I had any interest in politics. It was from young man know as Tupac Shakur, and let me tell you it is great to finally understand who Machiavelli is and the things he has done for the outlook on politics after hearing about how much respect and praise he got from the iconic rapper of the 1990s. In this paperRead MorePrinciples Of Machiavelli1615 Words   |  7 PagesIn the 16th century Niccolo Machiavelli presented Lorenzo de Medici with his most prized possession, â€Å"The Prince†. At this time, it was custom to present the prince with your most prized possession, in order to gain their friendship. Machiavelli spent much time studying past rulers and wrote â€Å"The Prince† in which he describes how one acquires and maintains power. At the time, The Prince was not well accepted as it went perceived to go against the Catholic Church. However, today the prince has beenRead MoreMachiavelli as a Humanist1886 Words   |  8 Pageswho is concerned with the interests and welfare of humans. Niccolo’ Machiavelli can be thought of as a humanist. Although opinions on this differ greatly depending on whom you speak with. Machiavelli’s life consists of so many examples and lessons that he has learned throughout his life. Through my paper, I intend to examine his perception of morality based on his political writings and life experiences. Niccolo’ Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469 and died in 1527. Although we do not knowRead MoreAnalysis Of Machiavelli774 Words   |  4 PagesChasity L Wireman Dr. Michael A. Lazarus HIS 102-W1: Western Civilization II 10/25/2017 There are many reasons why Machiavelli is widely considered the beginner of modern political thought, one of the many is he studied strictly the politicians, and businessmen. Machiavelli recognized the political playing field as a vile place only for the most dominating and cunning of political giants. One of Machiavelli’s most famous work, On Principalities, or known by the other title, The PrinceRead More Machiavelli Essay1438 Words   |  6 Pagesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Niccolo Machiavelli, one of the great political minds of the 15th century, accomplished what many mathematicians today only dream of, having one’s name used as an adjective. To be Machiavellian is to demonstrate characteristics of expediency, deceit, and cunning and as Machiavelli wrote in, The Prince, these are the qualities of a great leader. The Prince was published in 1531, creating great controversy with other political thinkers of the time. Machiavelli completely ignored theRead MoreThe Relat ionship Between Machiavelli And Machiavelli s The Prince1075 Words   |  5 Pagesand turmoil, philosophers are able to give their critiques on government and human nature as a whole. Socrates and Machiavelli, both philosophers in what it means to be a proper leader and the role of the people within a society, share contrasting views. Machiavelli, alive during the time of great political turmoil in Italy, is immortalized through his writings in The Prince. Machiavelli was able to use what the political shortcomings he witnesses during his time period as a guide to deciphering theRead MoreThe Prince, By Machiavelli1517 Words   |  7 PagesIn The Prince, Machiavelli doesn’t hesitate to recommend that a ruler employ conventionally immoral methods against his own subjects to maintain authority over them, but he does imply that whatever a ruler does should ultimately benefit the community. A Prince’s actions may be cruel, manipulative, or otherwise immoral, but they put him in the position to govern. On occasion, Machiavelli even suggests that gaining power through immoral acts is the best way to improve a community because immoralityRead MoreThe Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli1472 Words   |  6 PagesPrince by: Niccolo Machiavelli really tries and is successful at dividing politics and ethics to decipher the characteristics of a good and bad political/government ruling leader in this novel. In this reading, I seen 5 points that Machiavelli talked about, and those were: Free Will, Being Hated vs Goodwill, Virtue, A Good Military, and finally Human Nature. These are a necessity to the recipe that Machiavelli is making in this book. In the first few chapters of the book, Machiavelli begins to talkRead More Machiavelli And Plato Essay1564 Words   |  7 Pages Niccolio Machiavelli (Born May 3rd, 1469 amp;#8211; 1527 Florence, Italy.) His writings have been the source of dispute amongst scholars due to the ambiguity of his analogy of the amp;#8216;Nature of Politics; and the implication of morality. The Prince, has been criticised due to itamp;#8217;s seemingly amoral political suggestiveness, however after further scrutiny of other works such as The Discourses, one can argue that it was Machiavelliamp;#8217;s intention to infact imply a positive

Leadership Communication and Generation Essay - 1110 Words

Leadership Communication Communication is an essential part in a leaders daily work life, and without it, effective leadership does not exist. However, it is possible to be able to communicate without having to lead. These interactions can consist of transmitting communication through messages, pictures via email or text messages. For most humans it comes natural to interact through communication and shared symbols. Leaders can face barriers of communication, but finding new methods or tools that work appropriately in order to transmit their information is a crucial factor. The Way a Leader Communicates The way a leader communicates is not dependent from his or her age/generation. The classification of generations are chart by their birth†¦show more content†¦My leadership style has flourished by my hard work in hopes to leave an imprint and a legacy for my children. Unlike the past generations that were work obsessed, I have learned to be patient and empathetic. My empathetic leadership may be my flaw but for now, this has worked for me in the health care field. My primarily focus in my communication style is based on listening first and then thinking before I speak in order to give an appropriate answer or solution. My generation finds it easy to value change and innovation. For me, being a leader is not about delegating work but about coaching, teaching, and mentoring subordinates. It brings me joy to see one of my subordinates develop new skills and become promotable, due to my help in training him/her. I believe this is due to being an empathetic leader since another l eader took a chance in my earlier years, and ingrained in me that I too could be a leader someday with his coaching. My formal written communication style may not currently be up to par with my verbal communication. However, it is something that I am currently working on. For example, it takes me twice as long to write a formal email compared to an informal email. This is because I know the informal recipient. Not knowing my recipient personally is what affects the trust in my writing. This hesitation comes with doubt, writer’s block, stress, and worry. Once, I overcome myShow MoreRelatedLeadership and Communication: How Each Generation Communicates906 Words   |  4 PagesLeadership and Communication A leader’s age and generation plays a significant role in the way they communicate. When different generations come together they bring with them their own worldviews and expectations. An effective leader is able to step out of their generational preferences and customize the way they communicate to the other generations. By effectively addressing and taking advantage of those unique generational differences they can bridge the generations together to create a collaborativeRead MoreRole of Technology and the Information Age in Contemporary Leadership Communication884 Words   |  4 Pagesor her age/generation. I fully agree with this statement. In this paper, I evaluate the truth in this statement (with proof) by first describing the characteristics of my generation in regard to leadership and communication. I do this by using specific examples and reasons. Also evaluated is whether technology and the Information Age play a role in how leaders today communicate. The paper al so investigates if there are basic communication skills that are needed and used in all generations of leadershipRead MoreEngaging Others With Leadership. The Healthcare System1551 Words   |  7 PagesEngaging Others with Leadership The healthcare system includes multiple individuals with unique leadership skills to improve the quality of care for the patients. Leadership can be defined as identifying a goal to motivate others to act a certain way and provide support (Daly, Jackson. Rumsey, Patterson, Davidson, 2015). Nursing leadership combines both personal traits and theories that depend on the personality of the leader (Scully, 2015). A positive outcome from nursing leadership is that it canRead MoreThe Common Goals Of Nurses Essay1377 Words   |  6 Pagesworkforce needs to work in unity to build an organized team. A team is important and a nurse needs to practice leadership to facilitate team processes, job satisfaction and work performance to accomplish clinical objectives of the organization. Multiple Generations Nursing workforce consists of the 4 generations, which are the Traditionalist, Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y. Each generation has it own distinctive personality, beliefs, values and perceptions towards work. Knowledge and technologiesRead MoreHistory Of Participatory Management ( Rau Foster, 2017 )1533 Words   |  7 Pagesrun. Below is a list is common characteristics of the Baby Boomers leadership styles: †¢ Democratic †¢ Believed in chain of command †¢ Goal oriented †¢ Create stability †¢ Respect Loyalty Generation X Generation X (1965-1980) are taking hold in the workforce today (Schullery, 2013, p.235). The current age range for this generation is 28-43. This generation is known for Watergate, the energy crisis, end of the Cold War and Y2K. Generation X have many core values they adhere by. Some of those values includeRead MoreThe Generational Shift in Communication Essay1132 Words   |  5 PagesI believe that one’s age and generation do not affect their leadership style nearly as much as there life experience, motivation, and knowledge. A leader can be successful at any age, if they are willing and eager to constantly adapt their communication styles to accommodate their followers’ needs. However, within each generation there are different values and management styles and if an individual resists adapting to newer methods and neglects to embrace change they will not be a successful leaderRead MoreWorkplace Diversity: Communication between Management and Employees1517 Words à ‚  |  7 PagesWorkplace Diversity: Communication between Management and Employees Workplace challenges come in many forms. One of those challenges is communication, whether verbal or nonverbal, between co-workers or between management and employees. Businesses currently are being affected by communication issues that are hindering production, satisfaction, and employee retention (Salahuddin, 2010). Communication is a vital key to effective and good management. Face-to-face communication is always the bestRead MoreLeadership and Communication Across Generational Lines Essay example1016 Words   |  5 Pagesdifferent generations working together it is clear that each group has their own preference for communication. Throughout the context of this paper I will explore the generational differences, and describe the characteristics of my generation with regard to leadership and communication styles. I will also describe how technology and the information age play a role in how leaders communicate. Finally, I will identify basic communication skills that are needed and used in generational leadership. DoRead MoreThe Timeless Quality of the Foundations of Excellent Leadership1177 Words   |  5 PagesFoundations of Excellent Leadership Are Timeless Introduction It is often said that a manager is what one does and leader is who one is. This is especially the case during times of turbulent economic, social and political change. In the debate of whether the effectiveness of a leaders communication skills is dependent on their age or generation, one must take into account one of the most critical skills in any leaders skill set, and that is emotional intelligence (EI) (Avolio, Yammarino, 2002)Read MoreAuthentic Leadership for Age Diversity800 Words   |  4 PagesAuthentic Leadership for Age Diversity In the article â€Å"Bridging the Gap Between Gen X and Gen Y: Lessons From Authentic Leadership,† the authors highlight the issues of age diversity with a specific focus on issues between Generation X and Generation Y in the United States. They state that there are several attitudes, preferences, and characteristics that define each generation and create a fertile ground for organizational conflict. They argue that the solution for leaders with age diversity dilemmas

School Kills Creativity †Ken Robinson Free Essays

1. I agree with this statement, my explanation is that everybody got an education since they was born. First, you have to define the word â€Å"education†. We will write a custom essay sample on School Kills Creativity – Ken Robinson or any similar topic only for you Order Now In my opinion education is same as imitation because everyone learns by imitate from what people have done. Students learn mathematic by the method that ancient people made, baby or kids learn everything from what they have seen. You can see that when we were young, we imitated the way we speak from our parents, and we drew the picture from what we see. In that time, we enjoyed that moment. So, we can say that education is in our instinct. 2. 3. What he say happen to us because we have been taught to live in the same pattern, we have to do something in the same way, we have to do something in the same pattern, to make mistake is prohibited. If you learn from history, many things come from the mistaken; Alfred Nobel found Dynamite when he tries to make other thing. Another reason why I agree with his word is that we’re all taught by the same way, so after graduated, we’ll be something like a textbook that you can find it easily. Creativity is the thing that can’t be taught. It has in everyone but education system obstruct it. School kills creativity – Ken Robinson In his speech at the TED conference in February 2006, Sir Ken Robinson claims for a reformation of the current creativity retarding worldwide education system. His point of departure is that children are born with huge talents, wasted by the contemporary education system. While children are not afraid of being wrong, school and the ecological system eliminate this attitude. Read also  How Powerful Do You Find Atticus Finch’s Closing Speech? Robinson thinks that this, making mistakes, is the only way to develop new ideas, although getting on in life means not making mistakes. People, especially children, should have more space to be wrong, accordingly to possibilities of creating something new. Being developed in the 19th century, the education system is focused on providing the requirements for a job in the industry and academic ability. The orator points out that the hierarchy of subjects around the world is the same: first comes math and languages, followed by humanities and concluded by the arts, especially usic and art, after that drama and dance. In Robinson’s opinion this is the right order of priorities for a scientific career, but not for people of the future which have to solute the world problems in a more creative way. Talented people do not get the sense of achievement, because things they are good at are not valued at school; hence, their high creative potentials are wasted. Furthermore Sir Ken Robin son mentions an â€Å"academic inflation† around the world, since conditions for job entrance referring to one’s academic degree are raised. Intelligence is diversely based on visual, tonal, kinesthetically, dynamic and abstract influences as a result it is the interaction of different disciplinary ways of seeing things. That is why the whole body has to be educated to use the whole spectrum of human capacity. Therefore fundamental principles of the education system have to be changed in order to send the next generation into a better future. In my personal experience, around two years ago when I was in high school, I lost all of my confidence and didn’t know what I have to do. My score were lower than other students in the class. The teachers used to ignore me and treated me as a troublemaker. After finishing some internship in America, I’ve realized that I was not that kind. People who I had met in America, especially my boss and my co-worker, encourage me to do what I really want to do. And finally I have a confidence that I can do everything if I want to. Good morning. How are you? It’s been great, hasn’t it? I’ve been blown away by the whole thing. In fact, I’m leaving. (Laughter)  There have been three themes, haven’t there,  running through the conference, which are relevant  to what I want to talk about. One is the extraordinary evidence of human creativity  in all of the presentations that we’ve had  and in all of the people here. Just the variety of it  and the range of it. The second is that  it’s put us in a place where we have no idea what’s going to happen,  idea how I have an interest in education —  actually, what I find is everybody has an interest in education. Don’t you? I find this very interesting. say you  actually, you’re not often at dinner parties, frankly, if you work in education. (Laughter) You’re not asked. And you’re never asked back, curiously. That’s strange to me. But if you are, and you say to somebody,  you know, they say, â€Å"What do you do? †Ã‚  and you say you work in education,  you can see the blood run from their face. They’re like,  Ã¢â‚¬Å"Oh my God,† you know, â€Å"Why me? My one night out all week. † (Laughter)  But if you ask about their education,  they pin you to the wall. Because it’s one of those things  that goes deep with people, am I right? Like religion, and money and other things. I have a big interest in education, and I think we all do. We have a huge vested interest in it,  partly because it’s education that’s meant to  take us into this future that we can’t grasp. If you think of it, children starting school this year  will be retiring in 2065. Nobody has a clue –despite all the expertise that’s been on parade for the past four days —  what the world will look like  in five years’ time. And yet we’re meant  to be educating them for it. So the unpredictability, I think,  is extraordinary. And the third part of this is that  we’ve all agreed, nonetheless, on the  really extraordinary capacities that children have —  their capacities for innovation. I mean, Sirena last night was a marvel,  wasn’t she? Just seeing what she could do. And she’s exceptional, but I think she’s not, so to speak,  exceptional in the whole of childhood. What you have there is a person of extraordinary dedication  who found a talent. And my contention is,  all kids have tremendous talents. And we squander them, pretty ruthlessly. So I want to talk about education and  I want to talk about creativity. My contention is that  creativity now is as important in education as literacy,  and we should treat it with the same status. (Applause) Thank you. That was it, by the way. left. Well I heard a great story recently — I love telling it —  of a little girl who was in a drawing lesson. She was six  and she was at the back, drawing,  and the teacher said this little girl hardly ever  paid attention, and in this drawing lesson she did. The teacher was fascinated and she went over to her  and she said, â€Å"What are you drawing? †Ã‚  And the girl said, â€Å"I’m drawing a picture of God. †Ã‚  And the teacher said, â€Å"But nobody knows what God looks like. †Ã‚  And the girl said, â€Å"They will in a minute. †Ã‚  (Laughter) When my son was four in England —  actually he was four everywhere, to be honest. Laughter)  If we’re being strict about it, wherever he went, he was four that year. He was in the Nativity play. Do you remember the story? No, it was big. It was a big story. Mel Gibson did the sequel. You may have seen it: â€Å"Nativity II. † But James got the part of Joseph,  which we were thrilled about. We considered this to be one of the lead parts. We had the place crammed full of agents in T-shirts:  Ã¢â‚¬Å"James Robinson IS Joseph! † (Laughter)He didn’t have to speak, but you know the bit  where the three kings come in. They come in bearing gifts,  and they bring gold, frankincense and myrhh. This really happened. We were sitting there  and I think they just went out of sequence,  because we talked to the little boy afterward and we said,  Ã¢â‚¬Å"You OK with that? † And he said, â€Å"Yeah, why? Was that wrong? â€Å"They just switched, that was it. Anyway, the three boys came in —  four-year-olds with tea towels on their heads —  and they put these boxes down,  and the first boy said, â€Å"I bring you gold. †Ã‚  And the second boy said, â€Å"I bring you myrhh. †Ã‚  And the third boy said, â€Å"Frank sent this. † (Laughter) What these things have in common is that kids will take a chance. If they don’t know, they’ll have a go. Am I right? They’re not frightened of being wrong. Now, I don’t mean to say that being wrong is the same thing as being creative. What we do know is,  if you’re not prepared to be wrong,  you’ll never come up with anything original —  if you’re not prepared to be wrong. And by the time they get to be adults,  most kids have lost that capacity. They have become frightened of being wrong. way. We  where mistakes  And the result is that we are educating people out of  their creative capacities. Picasso once said this —  he said that all children are born artists. The problem is to remain an artist as we grow up. I believe this passionately,  that we don’t grow into creativity,  we grow out of it. Or rather, we get educated out if it. So why is this? I lived in Stratford-on-Avon until about five years ago. In fact, we moved from Stratford to Los Angeles. So you can imagine what a seamless transition that was. Actually, we  just outside Stratford, which is where  Shakespeare’s father was born. Are you struck by a new thought? I was. You don’t think of Shakespeare having a father, do you? Do you? Because you don’t think of  Shakespeare being a child, do you? Shakespeare being seven? I never thought of it. I mean, he was  seven at some point. He was in  somebody’s English class, wasn’t he? How annoying would that be? (Laughter) â€Å"Must try harder. † Being sent to bed by his dad, you know,  to Shakespeare, â€Å"Go to bed, now,†Ã‚  to William Shakespeare, â€Å"and put the pencil down. And stop speaking like that. It’s confusing everybody. †Ã‚  (Laughter) Anyway, we moved from Stratford to Los Angeles,  and I just want to say a word about the transition, actually. My son didn’t want to come. I’ve got two kids. He’s 21 now; my daughter’s 16. He didn’t want to come to Los Angeles. He loved it,  but he had a girlfriend in England. This was the love of his life, Sarah. He’d known her for a month. Mind you, they’d had their fourth anniversary,  because it’s a long time when you’re 16. Anyway, he was really upset on the plane,  and he said, â€Å"I’ll never find another girl like Sarah. †Ã‚  And we were rather pleased about that, frankly,  because she was the main reason we were leaving the country. (Laughter) But something strikes you when you move to America  and when you travel around the world:  Every education system on earth has the same hierarchy of subjects. Every one. Doesn’t matter where you go. You’d think it would be otherwise, but it isn’t. At the top are mathematics and languages,  then the humanities, and the bottom are the arts. Everywhere on Earth. And in pretty much every system too,  there’s a hierarchy within the arts. Art and music are normally given a higher status in schools  than drama and dance. There isn’t an education system on the planet  that teaches dance everyday to children  the way we teach them mathematics. Why? Why not? I think this is rather important. I think math is very important, but so is dance. Children dance all the time if they’re allowed to, we all do. We all have bodies, don’t we? Did I miss a meeting? Laughter) Truthfully, what happens is,  as children grow up, we start to educate them  progressively from the waist up. And then we focus on their heads. And slightly to one side. If you were to visit education, as an alien,  and say â€Å"What’s it for, public education? †Ã‚  I think you’d have to conclude — if you lo ok at the output,  who really succeeds by this,  who does everything that they should,  who gets all the brownie points, who are the winners —  I think you’d have to conclude the whole purpose of public education  throughout the world  is to produce university professors. Isn’t it? They’re the people who come out the top. And I used to be one, so there. (Laughter)  And I like university professors, but you know,  we shouldn’t hold them up as the high-water mark of all human achievement. life, another  them. There’s  not all of them, but typically — they live in their heads. They live up there, and slightly to one side. They’re disembodied, you know, in a kind of literal way. They look upon their body  as a form of transport for their heads, don’t they? meetings. If  by the way, get yourself along to a residential conference  of senior academics,  and pop into the discotheque on the final night. Laughter) And there you will see it — grown men and women  writhing uncontrollably, off the beat,  waiting until it ends so they can go home and write a paper about it. Now our education system is predicated on the idea of academic ability. And there’s a reason. The whole system was invented â₠¬â€ around the world, there were  no public systems of education, really, before the 19th century. They all came into being  to meet the needs of industrialism. So the hierarchy is rooted on two ideas. Number one, that the most useful subjects for work  are at the top. So you were probably steered benignly away  from things at school when you were a kid, things you liked,  on the grounds that you would  never get a job doing that. Is that right? Don’t do music, you’re not going to be a musician;  don’t do art, you won’t be an artist. Benign advice — now, profoundly mistaken. The whole world  is engulfed in a revolution. And the second is academic ability, which has really come to dominate  our view of intelligence,  because the universities designed the system in their image. If you think of it, the whole system  of public education around the world is a protracted process  of university entrance. And the consequence is that many highly talented,  brilliant, creative people think they’re not,  because the thing they were good at school  wasn’t valued, or was actually stigmatized. And I think we can’t afford to go on that way. In the next 30 years, according to UNESCO,  graduating through  combination of  technology and its transformation effect on work, and demography  and the huge explosion in population. Suddenly, degrees aren’t worth anything. Isn’t that true? When I was a student, if you had a degree, you had a job. If you didn’t have a job it’s because you didn’t want one. And I didn’t want one, frankly. (Laughter)  But now kids with degrees are often  heading home to carry on playing video games,  because you need an MA where the previous job required a BA,  other. It’s  And it indicates the whole structure of education  is shifting beneath our feet. We need to radically rethink  our view of intelligence. We know three things about intelligence. One, it’s diverse. We think about the world in all the ways  that we experience it. We think visually,  we think in sound, we think kinesthetically. We think in abstract terms, we think in movement. Secondly, intelligence is dynamic. If you look at the interactions of a human brain, as we heard  yesterday from a number of presentations,  intelligence is wonderfully interactive. The brain isn’t divided into compartments. In fact, creativity — which I define as the process  of having original ideas that have value —  more often than not comes about through the interaction  of different disciplinary ways of seeing things. The brain is intentionally — by the way,  there’s a shaft of nerves that joins the two halves of the brain  called the corpus callosum. It’s thicker in women. Following off from Helen yesterday, I think  this is probably why women are better at multi-tasking. Because you are, aren’t you? There’s a raft of research, but I know it from my personal life. If my wife is cooking a meal at home —  which is not often, thankfully. (Laughter)  But you know, she’s doing — no, she’s good at some things —  but if she’s cooking, you know,  she’s dealing with people on the phone,  she’s talking to the kids, she’s painting the ceiling,  she’s doing open-heart surgery over here. If I’m cooking, the door is shut, the kids are out,  the phone’s on the hook, if she comes in I get annoyed. I say, â€Å"Terry, please, I’m trying to fry an egg in here. Give me a break. † (Laughter)  Actually, you know that old philosophical thing,  if a tree falls in a forest and nobody hears it,  did it happen? Remember that old chestnut? I saw a great t-shirt really recently which said, â€Å"If a man speaks his mind  in a forest, and no woman hears him,  is he still wrong? † (Laughter) And the third thing about intelligence is,  it’s distinct. I’m doing a new book at the momentcalled â€Å"Epiphany,† which is based on a series of  interviews with people about how they discovered  their talent. I’m fascinated by how people got to be there. It’s really prompted by a conversation I had  with a wonderful woman who maybe most people  have never heard of; she’s called Gillian Lynne —  have you heard of her? Some have. She’s a choreographer  and everybody knows her work. She did â€Å"Cats† and â€Å"Phantom of the Opera. †Ã‚  She’s wonderful. I used to be on the board of the Royal Ballet in England,  as you can see. Anyway, Gillian and I had lunch one day and I said,  Ã¢â‚¬Å"Gillian, how’d you get to be a dancer? † And she said  it was interesting; when she was at school,  she was really hopeless. And the school, in the ’30s,  wrote to her parents and said, â€Å"We think  Gillian has a learning disorder. † She couldn’t concentrate;  she was fidgeting. I think now they’d say  she had ADHD. Wouldn’t you? But this was the 1930s,  and ADHD hadn’t been invented at this point. It wasn’t an available condition. (Laughter)  People weren’t aware they could have that. Anyway, she went to see this specialist. So, this oak-paneled room,  and she was there with her mother,  and she was led and sat on this chair at the end,  and she sat on her hands for 20 minutes while  this man talked to her mother about all  the problems Gillian was having at school. And at the end of it —  because she was disturbing people;  her homework was always late; and so on,  little kid of eight — in the end, the doctor went and sat  next to Gillian and said, â€Å"Gillian,  I’ve listened to all these things that your mother’s  told me, and I need to speak to her privately. †Ã‚  He said, â€Å"Wait here. We’ll be back; we won’t be very long,†Ã‚  and they went and left her. But as they went out the room, he turned on the radio  that was sitting on his desk. And when they  got out the room, he said to her mother,  Ã¢â‚¬Å"Just stand and watch her. † And the minute they left the room,  she said, she was on her feet, moving to the music. And they watched for a few minutes  and he turned to her mother and said,  Ã¢â‚¬Å"Mrs. Lynne, Gillian isn’t sick; she’s a dancer. Take her to a dance school. † I said, â€Å"What happened? †Ã‚  She said, â€Å"She did. I can’t tell you how wonderful it was. We walked in this room and it was full of  people like me. People who couldn’t sit still. People who had to move to think. † Who had to move to think. They did ballet; they did tap; they did jazz;  they did modern; they did contemporary. She was eventually auditioned for the Royal Ballet School;  she became a soloist; she had a wonderful career  at the Royal Ballet. She eventually graduated  from the Royal Ballet School and  founded her own company — the Gillian Lynne Dance Company —  met Andrew Lloyd Weber. She’s been responsible forsome of the most successful musical theater  productions in history; she’s given pleasure to millions;  and she’s a multi-millionaire. Somebody else  might have put her on medication and told her  to calm down. Now, I think †¦ (Applause) What I think it comes to is this:  Al Gore spoke the other nightabout ecology and the revolution that was triggered by Rachel Carson. I believe our only hope for the future  is to adopt a new conception of human ecology,  one in which we start to reconstitute our conception  of the richness of human capacity. Our education system has mined our minds in the way  that we strip-mine the earth: for a particular commodity. And for the future, it won’t serve us. We have to rethink the fundamental principles  on which we’re educating our children. There was  a wonderful quote by Jonas Salk, who said, â€Å"If all the insects  were to disappear from the earth,  within 50 years all life on Earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the earth,  within 50 years all forms of life would flourish. â€Å"And he’s right. What TED celebrates is the gift of the human imagination. We have to be careful now that we use this gift  wisely and that we avert some of the scenarios  that we’ve talked about. And the only way  we’ll do it is by seeing our creative capacities  for the richness they are and seeing  our children for the hope that they are. And our task  is to educate their whole being, so they can face this future. By the way — we may not see this future,  but they will. And our job is to help  them make something of it. Thank you very much. How to cite School Kills Creativity – Ken Robinson, Papers

Jean Piaget Essay Example Essay Example

Jean Piaget Essay Example Paper Jean Piaget Essay Introduction Jean Piaget was born in Switzerland in 1896. In his youth he studied philosophy and obtained a doctorate in biology by the age of 21. In his work in biology he discovered that molluscs could adapt to different environments and that their shells matured in a different way according to their environment. This discovery led him to consider how humans might adapt and mature differently according to their environment. This new area of interest led him to study developmental psychology and he went on to become one of the most respected and influential figures in the field. The majority of his work in psychology and that which he is most famous for is his theory of cognitive development. Piaget believed that children were born with an innate desire (and need) to adapt to their environment, and that they do this by interacting with it and learning from it. He came up with the idea of à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½schemasà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ which are the basic building blocks of intelligence. Babies start out with mi nimal in-built schemas for things such as sucking and grasping and moving limbs. As the baby grows its schemas are refined and combined to create more complex schemas such as for walking. This development takes place through the processes of à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½assimilationà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½, à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½accommodationà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ and à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½equilibriumà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½. A baby will try and apply its schema of sucking its motherà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s nipple to obtain nutrients to sucking a cup of juice; this is the babyà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s attempt to assimilate the task of drinking from a cup into its existing schemata. The sucking schema is inadequate for the task and the child will be in a state of disequilibrium. In order to restore balance the child must modify its existing schemas to accommodate the new task or experience. This is the process of à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½adaptationà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½. Jean Piaget Essay Body Paragraphs Piaget identified four main stages of cognitive development through which all children pass as they grow older. Each stage is typified by the kind of schemas a child a child has within that stage. The intellectual understanding attained at each stage builds upon that of the previous stage, and the stages are therefore passed through in sequence. Development remains continuous and fluid through all the stages however, rather than jumping from one stage to the next. The first stage is called the sensorimotor stage. This stage occupies approximately the first two years of the childà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s life. It is characterised by the childà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s hands-on approach to discovering the world around it. The child learns by hearing, seeing, smelling (sensory) and grasping, sucking and pulling (motor). The first few months are also characterised by the babyà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s lack of à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½object permanenceà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½. This means that the child is not able to understand that when an object is removed from view the object still exists. To the child, if an object is out of sight it is out of mind. The child is also extremely egocentric; it is unable to make the distinction between itself and the world around it. The second stage in Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s theory of cognitive development is the preoperational stage which lasts from the ages of 2 to 7 years old. During this stage the child greatly develops the ability to use symbols and language. Although the child learns to distinguish between itself and the rest of the world it is still egocentric in that it is unable to see things from other peopleà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s point of view or to à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½put itself in other peopleà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s shoesà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½. The next stage is called the concrete operational stage which last from 7 to 11 years of age. This stage is where the child acquires the ability to perform logical operations. These cognitive operations allow the child to make logical deductions which are not dependant on their perceptions although they still need a grounding in concrete experience. These logical operations are also fully reversible allowing the child to consider a great deal of possibilities. The child also becomes a great deal less egocentric, allowing it to become a lot more sociable and consider various points of view. The fourth and final stage is the formal operational stage which develops from the age of 11 to the age of 16. During this stage the childà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s ability to perform logical operations continues to grow and is freed from the need for actual experience of the object or situation. This enables the child to think in more abstract terms allowing them to consider hypothetical situations as well as real experiences. The child also becomes capable of à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½reflective abstractionà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ which allows them to acquire new knowledge by considering and reflecting upon existing knowledge. Piaget theory is coherent and offers a complete and detailed model of intellectua l development from birth to adulthood. It is the most well-known and possibly the most established theory of its kind. It is also one of the most controversial. Many psychologists have criticised Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s theory, especially with regard to the manner of the experiments he used to explore and prove his theories. One of the first criticisms of Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s work is that he often only used his own three children as test subjects for his experiments. This could introduce several confounding variables and problems with the validity of the results. First of all the use of only three participants for any kind of experiment is too small, especially when the results are to be applied to the whole world. Any kind of anomalies or unusual traits of his three children would be magnified. For instance, if one of his children was able to perform a particular mental operation at a very young age, this could be interpreted as meaning a third of the whole worldà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s children w ould be able to do the same, even though only a tiny proportion actually could. Another problem with Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s use of his own children is that there were many things in the childrenà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s lives and environment which would be unique to them. An important example of this is the fact that their father was one of the worldà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s leading scientists! How many people in the world can say that? This means that Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s great intelligence would have probably been passed on to his children in some way, either through genetics or through his interaction with them as they grew up. This means that they may have been more intellectually developed than the average child of their age and they would also be familiar with their fatherà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s way of thinking and communicating, perhaps helping them to perform better in his experiments. Although Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s theory is fundamentally based largely on his observations of his own children, it is worth noting t hat he also performed larger scale experiments and some of his earlier work with his own children was re-tested by himself and others with not too dissimilar results. Piaget has also been criticised for the wording he used during his experiments. Some say that his wording was often too advanced, abstract or ambiguous for the child to really understand what is required of them. There is also the issue of what each individual child understands of certain words. For instance, when performing a liquid conservation experiment, Piaget would ask the child if one glass had more water in it than the other. Would the child have the same understanding of the word à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½moreà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ as à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½three dimensional volumeà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ that Piaget would have? The child may interpret this as meaning à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½does one glass have more height of waterà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ in it. If so, then this is a different problem of cognition and does not necessarily mean that the child does not grasp the co ncept of conservation. Much of Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s work was based on observations, usually of his own children, which were non-experimental and recorded in a qualitative, yet systematic and comprehensive way. He saw this as the best way to solve the puzzles of cognitive development which concerned him. This kind of procedure produces results which are not easily analysed and do not give definitive à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½black and whiteà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ answers. The data he gathered is therefore open to some interpretation. Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s theory that children aged below seven are intrinsically egocentric has also been cast into serious doubt. Whilst it is generally agreed that youngsterà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s are egocentric to some extent, it has been observed that children as young as four are able to choose suitable gifts for their motherà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s birthday, rather than (as Piaget would have expected) buying toys that they themselves would like. It has also been shown that children as young as four can use à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½child-contingentà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ language to talk to younger children, meaning that they modify their language making it less complex, so that it can be understood by the toddler. There are many flaws in Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s theory of cognitive development and perhaps even more flaws in the methodology he used to explore and verify it. The volume of criticism that this has generated has left very few people who still entirely agree with Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s theory. Many people dispute his theory as a whole. This revolt however does not necessarily mean that Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s contribution to the field of cognitive development is invalidated, in fact, in some ways it only serves to highlight how important his work has become. All other alternative theories of cognitive development stem from or are inspired by Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s work in one way or another. Some are an attempt to build on or refine his disputed theories into a more practical or rational explanation. Man y new theories are a reaction to Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s, very much at odds with his ideas and often from an opposite viewpoint (such as Vygotsky). If Piaget had not formed and published his theories on cognitive development then Vygotsky and other theorists may never have come to offer their alternative views and the subject of cognitive development may not have been researched nearly as much as it has been to date. For this reason, even if Piagetà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s theories are eventually largely dismissed or disproven, his contribution to the subject should still be considered of great importance. We will write a custom essay sample on Jean Piaget Essay Example specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Jean Piaget Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Jean Piaget Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer

Free Essays on Macbeth

Macbeth Macbeth is the tale of an over ambitious man pushed into committing a brutal murder that escalated into a massacre of people. Shakespeare’s depiction of women in this play shows how manipulating they can become when they lack physical strength. Both the witches and Lady Macbeth played key roles in shaping Macbeth into a power hungry tyrant. But the blame for the murders cannot be places solely on one person for each one was guilty in their own way. Through out the play, we encounter three witches who represent Fate. The witches were known to toy with people using their magic as they described in Act1 scene 3 when they sent a storm out on a poor sailor. Being able to see the future, they met with Macbeth and hailed him as three things, Thane of Glamis, Thane of Cawdor, and shalt be king hereafter. They knew that once Macbeth was honored as Thane of Cawdor, his ambition and lust for power would be revealed. Macbeth had fallen into their power when their predictions came true. If they had never spoken with Macbeth, the idea of Macbeth becoming king would have never been raised, preventing these murders. When the play began, Macbeth was more of an easily manipulated person and so was pushed into proceeding with his initial reaction. Lady Macbeth was as ambitious as her husband was and stronger. She wanted the power for herself and her husband. We see how badly she wanted this when she prays to the spirits to â€Å"unsex her† and to â€Å"stop up the access and passage to remorse† so that they could follow through with this cruel act. She was so heartless that she planned on framing innocent men for the murder of the king showing her masculine thoughts in this woman’s body. Lady Macbeth knew that her husband would talk himself out of the plan and so she manipulated him by questioning his manhood and calling him a coward if he didn’t go through with it. This pushed him over the top and he continued with the scheme so as to ... Free Essays on Macbeth Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth Macbeth is the tale of an over ambitious man pushed into committing a brutal murder that escalated into a massacre of people. Shakespeare’s depiction of women in this play shows how manipulating they can become when they lack physical strength. Both the witches and Lady Macbeth played key roles in shaping Macbeth into a power hungry tyrant. But the blame for the murders cannot be places solely on one person for each one was guilty in their own way. Through out the play, we encounter three witches who represent Fate. The witches were known to toy with people using their magic as they described in Act1 scene 3 when they sent a storm out on a poor sailor. Being able to see the future, they met with Macbeth and hailed him as three things, Thane of Glamis, Thane of Cawdor, and shalt be king hereafter. They knew that once Macbeth was honored as Thane of Cawdor, his ambition and lust for power would be revealed. Macbeth had fallen into their power when their predictions came true. If they had never spoken with Macbeth, the idea of Macbeth becoming king would have never been raised, preventing these murders. When the play began, Macbeth was more of an easily manipulated person and so was pushed into proceeding with his initial reaction. Lady Macbeth was as ambitious as her husband was and stronger. She wanted the power for herself and her husband. We see how badly she wanted this when she prays to the spirits to â€Å"unsex her† and to â€Å"stop up the access and passage to remorse† so that they could follow through with this cruel act. She was so heartless that she planned on framing innocent men for the murder of the king showing her masculine thoughts in this woman’s body. Lady Macbeth knew that her husband would talk himself out of the plan and so she manipulated him by questioning his manhood and calling him a coward if he didn’t go through with it. This pushed him over the top and he continued with the scheme so as to ... Free Essays on Macbeth Lady Macbeth Responsible For Duncan's Death John Keating English Honors Lady Macbeth Must Take Some Blame for Her Husband’s Destruction In Macbeth, a play written by Shakespeare, Lady Macbeth is partially responsible for the destruction of her husband. Lady Macbeth is not a monster without feelings, however she is tricky and cunning when she influences Macbeth to kill Duncan. Lady Macbeth’s ability to influence her husband leads the audience to believe that she is the primary cause for the destruction of Macbeth. The audience is also led to believe that Lady Macbeth is responsible because she makes up the details of the plan to kill Duncan, while Macbeth was considering not even going through with the murder. Although Macbeth had the thought of killing Duncan, he would not have acted on that thought unless Lady Macbeth persuaded him. Lady Macbeth is sly person, able to manipulate her husband, and this ability to manipulate Macbeth makes her partially responsible for the destruction of Macbeth. Lady Macbeth knows that her husband is too kind to kill Duncan without her help she fears â€Å"thy nature; / It is too full o’th’ milk of human kindness / to catch the nearest way† (I.v.16-18). She is very much aware of the fact that she needs to push Macbeth to kill Duncan or else he will not do it. We see Macbeth’s hesitance to murder the king when he lists reasons not to kill Duncan in Act 1, when he says, â€Å"He’s here in double trust: / First, as I am his kinsman and his subject, / Strong both against the deed; then, as his host, / Who should against his murderer shut the door, / Not bear the knife myself† (I.vii.12-16). Macbeth then says, â€Å"Besides, this Duncan / Hath born his faculties so meek, hath been / So clear in his great office, that his virtues / Will plead like angles, trumpet-tongued, against / The deep damnation of his taking off† (I.vii.16-19). We s... Free Essays on Macbeth The Tragedy of Macbeth There are many themes in the play Macbeth that apply to today’s world. Greed is one of the main themes in this particular Shakespeare play. An example of a person who is greedy in this play is Lady Macbeth. There are many power struggles that occur in Macbeth. Many people wanted to be kings and have power, but couldn’t. Macbeth wanted to have power, but he couldn’t control himself when it came to doing something about it. The third theme would have to be self-control. People need to know how to think or what to do in certain situations such as the problems that go on in the play Macbeth. Everyone, at some point in time in their life, feels greed. I know that I have felt greedy at least once in my life. A lot of people do not realize it until they are told by someone else. Lady Macbeth would be considered a greedy person in Macbeth. She is a deeply ambitious woman who lusts for power and position. She begs her husband, Macbeth, to kill Duncan and seize the crown. Lady Macbeth is eventually taken to madness and suicide by her guilt over all of the problems that have occurred. Greed is one of the reasons why Lady Macbeth killed herself. There were always very many power struggles that went on throughout the entire play. Power was pretty much all that anyone wanted in Macbeth. Macbeth kills Duncan in order to become the king of Scotland. Macbeth is also Thane of Cawdor. Macbeth wants power more than anything. He hires a group of murderers to kill Banquo. The witches tell Macbeth that he cannot be harmed by any man born of woman, and he will be safe until Birnam Wood moves itself to Dunsinane Castle. Macbeth feels pretty relieved with those ideas. During the play Macbeth, Macbeth goes through many times where he has no self-control. An example of that would have to be when at the royal feast, Banquo’s ghost visits Macbeth, causing him to cry out and startle... Free Essays on Macbeth Like so many of Shakespeare's plays, Macbeth is also a tragedy. There are many events in the play, which prove this. They are the murders of many innocent people. Three such murders are the murder of the king Duncan, and the murder of Banquo, which was ordered by Macbeth, and the murder Macduff's wife and son. These events are what make Shakespeare's, Macbeth a true tragedy. The murder of Duncan, the king of Scotland, was one of the main events of this tragedy. Every one, his subjects, his generals, the noblemen of Scotland, and all others liked Duncan. However, for the greed of power the General of his own army, Macbeth, murdered Duncan. When the news of Duncan's death spread across Scotland, people were terrified. Duncan was an innocent person. He had done nothing wrong. Macbeth's reason for murdering Duncan was to be his successor. He wanted to be king badly; this is what drove him into coming up with the plan of killing Duncan. This murder pleased Macbeth, and his wife. However, the murder of Duncan does not please the people of Scotland, or Banquo, Duncan's other military general. Banquo suspects, Macbeth of killing king Duncan. Macbeth was driven to the craze of power, when the three witches, told him, that he would be king after Duncan had passed away. â€Å"All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Glamis!†(Act1 sc.3 p17) said the first wi tch. ! â€Å"All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Cawdor!†(Act1 sc.3 p17) said the second witch. â€Å"All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter!† (Act1 sc3 p17) said the third witch. Macbeth was not patient enough to wait for Duncan to die of natural causes and so he killed him. An innocent person killed for the greed of power. The second event, which caused this play to become a tragedy, is the death of Banquo. Macbeth was also told by the witches that Banquo's children would be Macbeth's successor. Macbeth got worried that he will lose his throne. â€Å"To be thus is nothing, But t... Free Essays on MACBETH Macbeth AP English 1* While reading Macbeth many questions concerning the interpretation of scenes may arise in one’s mind. Shakespeare’s depiction of various important actions in the play allows the reader to personally decide how each scene is being portrayed. This variability in the interpretation of some key scenes makes it possible to give an in depth analysis of the events effecting many outcomes. One of these perplexing questions that arose throughout the reading was whether it was the witches’ and their prophecies or Lady Macbeth that had a greater influence on Macbeth’s murderous actions. A second inquiry that came up was one having to do with fate and Macbeth’s actions in attempts to change it. Did Macbeth have to take any action in order to meet his fate or was it inevitable that certain things would occur? A third and final question that persisted throughout the play was the uncertainty of Lady Macbeth’s feelings towards the murders. Did Lady Macbethâ €™s guilt lead to compassion for the victims, thus showing that she did indeed have a conscience or was she purely evil, feeling no remorse at all throughout the entire play? Although there is really no right answer to these questions, one can try to analyze the way in which Shakespeare hoped each scene would be interpreted. Perhaps Shakespeare himself purposely left these vital scenes open-ended in order to allow the reader to get what they wanted out of the play. Was it the witches’ prophecies in the first scene of the play that had the greatest impact on Macbeth’s murderous rampage or did Lady Macbeth convince him to do these evil things through her demeaning comments and persuasive mockery? The witches did shock Macbeth with their prophecies, that to him seemed impossible, but it was Lady Macbeth who ultimately talked Macbeth into slaughtering his first victim. The prophecies merely planted a seed in Macbeth’s mind that continued to gro... Free Essays on Macbeth People are often influenced by their peers to make certain important decisions. Even though most have the strength and self-control to make their own decisions, occasionally one may make the wrong decision due to the pressure of another person. Obviously it is wrong to persuade someone to make a bad decision, but it is just as bad to make that wrong decision. Moreover, It is very hard to say who would be guiltier. In the play by Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, Lady Macbeth and Macbeth are both very guilty for different reasons. At the beginning of the play, Macbeth is a trusted soldier, who is honest and noble. Unfortunately, he meets three witches who tell him three prophecies; that he will become thane of Cawdor that he will become king and that Banquo’s sons will become kings. These three prophecies slowly change his opinions on life and turn him into a greedy, dishonest, tyrant, full of ambition. Lady Macbeth’s thoughts change as well when she is told about the three prophecies that were told to Macbeth. In the beginning of the play, Lady Macbeth is ambitious, controlling and domineering. She is the one who encourages him to kill the king, she not only encourages him, she makes all the plans herself, which shows her determination and persistence, which proves her more guilty. â€Å"Yet I do fear thy nature, it is too full o’th milk of human kindness. To catch the nearest way thou wouldst be great. Art not without ambition, but without the illness should attend it." (Act 1, scene 5) . Lady Macbeth is the force behind Macbeth’s sudden ambition and she tries to manipulate him into feeling guilty and unmanly for not following through with the murder, by using her husband’s emotions, she manages to convince Macbeth to murder Duncan. After the death of King Duncan, Macbeth becomes the more controlling one, and Lady Macbeth’s guilt eventually becomes too much for her to handle which leads to her death. Which shows that she... Free Essays on Macbeth â€Å"Trace the Use of Blood Imagery Throughout the Play and Discuss it’s Significance† Throughout the story of Macbeth blood plays a sickening yet significant role. Blood is used as a symbol of guilt, but is also used to signify death. In the beginning of the play Macbeth is showed to be a faithful knight who could do no wrong, but as his days continued he proved to be a man obsessed with the future. Unfortunately, his future involved many disgraceful things including murder upon murder. Macbeth’s first murder is the first time we see the significant use of blood. After murdering Duncan, Macbeth says this, â€Å"Will all great Neptune’s ocean wash this blood Clean from my hand? No; this my hand will rather The multitudinous seas incarnadine, Making the green one red.† (II, ii, 59-62) Macbeth is feeling his guilt and believes that this â€Å"blood† will never be washed from his hands. The blood he is referring to is not only the actual blood but the guilt he is facing. The blood in this situation is used to signify Macbeth’s guilt. Another instance of the use of blood is when Macbeth states, â€Å" Blood hath been shed ere now, i’ the’ olden time, Ere humane statute purged the gentle weal; Ay, and since too, murders have been performed Too terrible for the ear. The times has been That, when the brains were out, the man would die........† (III, iv, 76-80). This is an example of how Macbeth feels about how death is treated. He believes that blood is shed because government made it seem not as bad as it really is. The last time we see an imagery of blood in Macbeth is when the apparitions visit him after Macduff’s death. The second apparition was a bloodied symbol of Macduff. Shakespeare tells us that the second apparition is a bloody child, a symbol of Macduff at birth. â€Å" Be bloody, bold, and resolute! Laugh to scorn The pow’r of man, for none of woman born Shall harm Macbeth† (I... Free Essays on Macbeth The story of Macbeth, like most of Shakespeare's plays, tells a story that has a moral lesson attached to it. Macbeth was essentially a man who craved power but when a prophecy was revealed that he would indeed gain that which he sought, Macbeth wasn't satisfied. Instead, he went to great lengths to ensure that his power lasted longer than it should have. He ahdered to the evil whims and plans of his wife, Lady Macbeth, and put himself in a position that destroyed his self respect, ruined his pride, degraded his honor, and spoiled his integrity... all in order to possess...and maintain the crown... Macbeth is a character of powerful contradictions. He is a man who, for the simple sake of his own ambition, is willing to murder his king and his best friend. At the same time, Macbeth has a conscience so strong that the mere thought of his crimes torments him to no end. As with any of Shakespeare's work, what we learn is essentially up to us as is the way we view the story. Reading Macbeth, one could easily infer that the pursuit of power and control bare a great price. We see that Macbeth essentially loses his integrity and honor as a direct result of his own actions. Macbeth is no longer happy with who he is or what he has done despite the fact he gets all that which he set out to gain. This is a very common lesson indeed: Macbeth failed to realize that he needed to be more proud of himself than of the material things he could gain. And thus, in trying to acquire his idea of "everything" Macbeth tragically lost everything instead.. The ends simply didn't justify the means nece ssary to attain them. And it is this very theme... this very idea and so many others pertinent to the study of Macbeth In 1606 William Shakespeare, the Bard of Avon, wrote a play which would go down in history as the cursed Scottish play after numerous mishaps during production. It was written for his new patron, James I (James VI of Scotland), following ... Free Essays on Macbeth Aristotle defines tragedy as â€Å"an imitation of action that is admirable, complete and possesses magnitude.† A tragedy must be preformed by actors and not through narration and, if done correctly, produce a feeling of catharsis at its finale. A tragedy must contain six essential parts to be complete according to Aristotle; plot, character, dictation, thought, spectacle, and song. Macbeth, by William Shakespeare is a perfect example of an Aristotelian tragedy due to into numerous structural parallels to Aristotle’s Poetics. Macbeth, through it use of many principles laid out in Aristotle’s Poetics, is regarded as an Aristotelian tragedy. The plot is referred to as the â€Å"soul of a tragedy† by Aristotle. In the case of Macbeth the plot is complex. In order for a complex plot to be complete it must contain numerous aspects. There must be an instance of suffering, some form of active circumstance and a change in fortune brought about by a reversal, recognition, or both. A reversal is an occurrence when a character produces an opposite effect than originally intended, whereas, recognition is a change from ignorance to knowledge. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth both recognition and a reversal are present. Macbeth experiences a state of recognition when he realizes that which prophesies are unfolding to a fuller extent than he had expected. Macbeth believes that he is invincible because, the witches prophesized that no man born of woman could harm him in any way. However upon meeting Macduff in his final hour he learned that Macduff was not of natural birth because, he was untimely ripped from his mother’ s womb. This scene is also an example of a reversal. Macbeth is under the impression that he will defeat Macduff due to the fact that all men are born of woman. However, the opposite effect is produced when he learns of Macduff unnatural birth. Another aspect of Aristotelian thought that is exhibited in Macbeth is that the story is univ... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth is a play full of darkness, evil, and tragedy. It is the story of a man who goes against his conscience and commits a horrible deed which leads to his destruction and loss of everything he has around him. This includes the relationship he has with his wife, Lady Macbeth. In the end, he can blame no one but himself. At the beginning of the play, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth have a very strong relationship and this deteriorates later. Act 1 Scene 5 is a key scene which shows just how close Macbeth and Lady Macbeth were at the beginning of the play; it shows their original relationship. Macbeth has written a letter to Lady Macbeth telling her of everything and in this letter states algo that she helped him to get everything for him. The following speech where Lady Macbeth doubts that he can get to the title of King "he is too full of the milk of human kindness" shows just how close they were. It establishes the fact that she knew him so well, she knew what he was like and it emphasises the closeness of their relationship. She speaks of how he has enough ambition but not enough courage. His "overiding ambition" is not enough. When Macbeth and Lady Macbeth speak, they speak to eachother with such closeness and bond; he calls her his "dearest chuck", his "partner of greatness". She knows that he is too weak to do anything and states her position in the murder "leave the rest to me". In Act 1, Scene 7 establishes the force and power that Lady Macbeth posseses over her husband. Upon hearing of Macbeth's decision not to kill Duncan, she is outraged and starts to work her force and power upon him. She knows where he is most vulnerable and attacks him at his weak spot. She strikes him at his manhood and courage. This of course works on Macbeth and she knows that it will. No one calls Macbeth a coward. She says that he is a coward and attacks his manliness. "to be more than what you are, you would be so much more the man". She challeng... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth King Duncan of Scotland = Duncan is a mature and effective king who rules Scotland during a time of political upheaval and turmoil. He is too old to command the armies himself and his sons are too young and inexperienced to fight in wars, but he has several great captains under his command, which allows him to remain in power. Those that remain loyal to him do so because they see that his rule is divinely sanctioned. When Macbeth hesitates in his decision to assassinate Duncan, the reason is that he fears Duncan’s â€Å"virtues / Will plead like angels, trumpet-tongued against the deep damnation of his taking-off† (I.vii.17-18) – that the very heavens will object to the murder of a king so holy. It turns out that Macbeth’s fears are justified – on the night of his murder, chimneys are blown down, the earth shakes, owls scream and kill falcons, and horses run wild and eat each other. Malcolm = The elder son of King Duncan, Malcolm is named the Prince of Cumberland and heir apparent early on in the play. After his father is murdered at Macbeth’s castle, he and his younger brother, Donalbain, decide to split up and flee for safety because they will probably be the next targets of the murderers. Although they are safe abroad (Malcolm in England, Donalbain in Ireland), they are not at home to defend themselves against accusations by the Scottish thanes (the equivalent of English earls), that they murdered their own father for the crown. In time, it becomes clear that Macbeth perpetrated the regicide on Duncan, and Macduff seeks out Malcolm in the English court to return to Scotland to claim his birthright and rescue them from Macbeth’s tyrannical rule. Malcolm has since been prospering in the English court of Edward the Confessor, a figure remarkably similar to Duncan, and he has learned much about politics and warfare. By the time Macduff comes looking for him, he has already enlisted the aid of Siward, Earl of Northumb... Free Essays on Macbeth â€Å"Lady Macbeth Far Worse than Macbeth† Lady Macbeth is depicted as being much worse than her husband in Shakespeare’s play , â€Å"Macbeth† . Although they both think of murdering King Duncan as soon as they hear the witches' prophecies, Macbeth thinks more about what he may or may not do, whereas Lady Macbeth immediately appeals to evil spirits to give her the strength to kill Duncan. When Macbeth first hears the prophecies, and when the prophecies begin to be fulfilled, he does think of killing the king, but also, towards the end of Act 1, Scene 3, he thinks that perhaps he doesn't need to do anything to become the king: "If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me without my stir." On the other hand, Lady Macbeth, on receiving the letter telling her about the witches' prophecies, she immediately thinks that she and Macbeth will have to kill King Duncan. She also decides that Macbeth is too nice to kill the king, sayin that he "is too ful o' the milk of human kindness" and when she hears the Duncan will visit their castle that night, she immediately appeals to the evil spirits, to (ironically) give her the strength to kill the king. In Act 1, Scene 7, Macbeth is doubtfull of Lady Macbeth's plot to kill the king. He doesn't think that he will be able to live with the guilt of killing his king while he is staying under his very roof, and then decides tha t he will not kill the king. This shows that Macbeth is thinking about what he is going to do, and shows that he does feel guilt and is weighing up the situation, unlike Lady Macbeth who never thinks twice about killing the king. When Lady Macbeth notices that Macbeth has left the room, she goes to speak to him. Macbeth firmly tells her that they will not kill the king: "we will proceed no further in this business". Lady Macbeth, however, tells him that his love is worth nothing if he refuses to go through with the plan, saying that his love is as accountable as hi... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth Essay In Macbeth, a play by William Shakespeare, the character Macbeth runs into many misfortunes that bring him to a terrible end. Three witches first introduce him to many strange and curious prophecies. Then his controlling wife, Lady Macbeth, pushes him to commit crimes that not even God could forgive. In the end though, Macbeth is the true master of his own destiny when he believes the prophecies that the witches feed him, when he lets Lady Macbeth control him, and then when he betrays his friends and becomes disloyal. Macbeth is the master of his own destiny when he believes all of the witches prophecies. After a long and gruesome war, Macbeth and Banquo are traveling home together and they come across three witches who give them three prophecies. The prophecies state that Macbeth will first become Thane of Cawdor, then he will be king, and then they state that Banquo’s sons will be king. Then not even a few minutes later the first prophecy given to Macbeth comes true. â€Å"He bade me from him, call thee Thane of Cawdor... For it is thine† (335,105). The king named Macbeth Thane of Cawdor for all his good deeds in war. This started Macbeth thinking that his second prophecy and Banquo’s prophecy might come true. â€Å"Glamis and Thane of Cawdor! The greatest is behind... Do you not hope your children shall be kings when those that gave the Thane of Cawdor to me promised no less to them† (335,117). Thinking that these prophecies may come true will later lead Macbeth to do many horrible deeds. Macbeth is the master of his own destiny when he allows Lady Macbeth to control him and attack his ego. Macbeth sends word to his wife as soon as his first prophecy comes true, explaining all that has happened to him. Lady Macbeth immediately devises a plan to kill King Duncan so that her husband can become king. â€Å"Be the serpent under’t. He that’s coming must be provided for: and you shall put this ni... Free Essays on Macbeth In Shakespeare’s play Macbeth and Lady Macbeth were alike in several ways, but they were also different in some ways. Both had similar views of what they wanted, but had different ways of getting this. This similarities and differences were shown throughout the play. Macbeth was a man of great loyalty and was well respected at the beginning of the play. Lady Macbeth was also respected in the beginning of the play. After Macbeth met with the witches and they told him about his future, he didn’t think much of it until he was named Thane of Cawdor. After he was named Thane, he began to think of what else the witches had told him. He began thinking of bigger and better things, like becoming king of Scotland. Macbeth was eager and ambitious to find out if the witches were correct about his future. He immediately wrote home to Lady Macbeth after he was named Thane of Cawdor, telling her that the king was coming to reside at their house. Lady Macbeth immediately began thinking of power and how she would love to be a queen. She began thinking of ways to murder king Duncan. After Macbeth arrived home, he didn’t like the idea of killing Duncan until Lady Macbeth questioned his manliness. After she questioned his manliness, he went along with the idea to murder Duncan because he didn’t want his wife to think less of him. They were both so ambitious that they murdered the king. Greed was also a big problem for Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. They both wanted power so badly they would do anything to get it, even if it meant killing innocent people, which was exactly what Macbeth did. He murdered Duncan; he also had Banquo murdered along with Macduff’s family. Lady Macbeth was also greedy because she convinced her husband into Duncan’s murder. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth were also similar in the ways that they suffered. They both suffered emotionally, mentally and physically as the play progressed. After they began their murdering spree, the... Free Essays on Macbeth There are many things that tempt people to do some wrong things, something what is not allowed. Most of the time it’s easier and more fun to do wrong things than the good ones. For example it is easier to steal than to earn money by working; it easier to lie than to tell the truth. We define good and strong people by their ability to resist different kinds of their temptation. And another part of our society consists of people who are weak, who are tempted to go by an easier way but sinful. And a good example of such people is Macbeth. The witches could foretell the future for him, they could add temptation, and influence Macbeth, but they could not control his destiny. They didn’t lead him to his destructions; his ambitions and desires have destroyed him. Macbeth, at the beginning of the play seems to be a very noble person. We see him as loyal and honorable. He fights in the battle against Norway which proves his loyalty, then he is appointed Thane of Cawdor which proves that he is honorable and respected by the king. However, as soon as the witches tell him their prediction: â€Å"all hail, Macbeth! That shalt be king hereafter†. (I, iii, 52) He is no longer trustworthy and becomes evil and deceiving. The witches have a great influence, but in the end, it's Macbeth's decision to fall for the temptation. Even before he reaches his home, thoughts of murder spark in his head and he is overcome with the desire to be powerful. Lady Macbeth has played an important part in tempting Macbeth for murdering even more then the witches. She was like Eve who tempts Adam to eat the forbidden fruit. Seeing that Macbeth is unsure about the witches’ prophecies she encourages Macbeth to kill the Duncan. Lady Macbeth is very ambitious person. She even says: "Thou wouldst be great/ Art not without ambition". (I, v, 80-81) Macbeth also says: "his beset... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth Ambitious hero or Tragic fool Shakespeare’s play â€Å"Macbeth† deals with events that demonstrate contrasts between good and evil, treason and honour. The supernatural element of the play provides a dilemma for Macbeth, which ultimately leads to his tragic down fall. In the opening scenes Shakespeare introduces Macbeth as a courageous soldier and a nobleman. â€Å"What he hath lost, noble Macbeth hath won† Act 1 scene 2 Macbeth is thought of very highly and is pronounced Thane of Cawdor. I think Macbeth deserved this title, because he evidently showed great courage in battle, and was highly supported by his wife. In addition to this, he showed great loyalty and tremendous ambition. In the last scenes of Act 1 Shakespeare shows how a partner can influence a person when making decisions. Macbeth greatly loved his wife, L. Macbeth he displayed this firstly his actions and speech and secondly in the way he respected her thoughts and views. Macbeth was a loyal husband and a noble thane as opposed to the tragic mistakes he made such as killing to fulfil his ambitions â€Å"O worthiest cousin† Act 1 scene 4 The king trusted Macbeth and the king tells him what a worthy Thane he is but Macbeth thinks it is just his duty. Some of Shakespeare’s language is quite archaic. Shakespeare uses great characterisation he doesn’t give each character a lengthy description, but from his writers’ craft, we can grasp their good qualities and also their bad. One of Macbeth’s traits is he was easily led astray, he might have appeared to be a strong character but L. Macbeth still managed to talk him into murder. L. Macbeth was very much in control, although it was visions that also influenced him. â€Å"Is this a dagger which I see before me†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Act Scene Just before Macbeth kills Duncan he sees a dagger in a vision. The dagger is leading him towards Duncan’s chamber. I think the dagger made Macbeth n... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth â€Å"Macbeth† by William Shakespeare is a play, which involves the downfall of its male protagonist. Like many of Shakespeare’s plays, the hero has a tragic flaw or personal weakness, which is responsible for their downfall. In this case it is Macbeth’s â€Å"vaulting ambition† which is considered his great weakness. In this essay I will discuss to what extent I agree or disagree with this view of Macbeth’s character. As with a number of Shakespeare’s heroin’s Macbeth’s personal flaw is to some degree responsible for his eventual downfall. The only reason Macbeth and Lady Macbeth originally give for planning the murder of Duncan is this â€Å"vaulting ambition†. This is unmistakable in Act 1, Scene 7 when in lines 26 and 27 Macbeth himself says, â€Å"To prick the sides of my intent, but only Vaulting ambition, which o’erleaps itself†. This dialogue in the first act of the play lets us know that Macbeth is aware of his vaulting ambition. There is no doubt that his personal flaw is to blame for his decision to kill Duncan, but his eventual downfall, in my opinion has more to do with his fascination with the witch’s prophecy. The witch’s proclaim that Macbeth will be king and so too shall the sons of Banquo. He knows that to become king he must kill Duncan, and he also knows that it would be robbing his country of a great king. He allows Lady Macbeth and greed to cloud his judgment and he finally agrees to commit the murder. I believe the reason for Macbeth killing Duncan is due to the persuasive Lady Macbeth and his vaulting ambition. Despite this being the reason for Macbeth committing the murder of Duncan, the rest of Macbeth’s crimes, murders and his eventual downfall are due more to his obsession with the witch’s prophecy. The evil witches deceive Macbeth by giving him vague and unclear truths in their prophecies. As a result of these vague truths, Macbeth makes rash decisions that lead him to ... Free Essays on Macbeth Shakespeare’s Theme in Macbeth Macbeth is essentially a play about rebellion and the price of disorder. It is a deeply conservative play, a reactionary attack upon the enemies of kingship dressed up as a poetic mediation upon the pathology of evil. As with all classic tragedies, theatre is used to purge anti social feeling and so reinforce the status quo In the summer of 1606, Shakespeare sat contented as King James I, rapt with awe, watched Macbeth. Shakespeare had much wanted such a reaction from the King, who was well known for falling asleep during plays. Indeed it is said that his very purpose for writing Macbeth was most likely to be to honour the new King from Scotland. The Tragedy of Macbeth was based in legend, a story that James had been told repeatedly during his childhood, because of his own direct link to the story (James was one of Banquo’s foretold descendants to sit on the throne of Scotland). Shakespeare wrote Macbeth in full consciousness of these facts, knowing that writing a play that had personal connections to James, and which promoted negative feelings toward rebellion and disorder, would put him in good favour with the King. It is not only the Kings historical affiliation with the play that hints at Macbeth being written as a form of propaganda promoting peace and order. King James had personal ties with Shakespeare himself. As King, one of James’ first acts was to take over Shakespeare’s company and to promote them to be his own servants, so that henceforth they were known as the King’s Men. They acted very frequently at Court, and prospered accordingly. It was in Shakespeare’s interest to write a play that would appease James and advocate his Kingship. Perhaps of the most important pieces of evidence from a contextual perspective, supporting the above theory, are some of the events that took place during James reign. Indeed many of the events that occur in the play have a direct correlation to... Free Essays on Macbeth The Witches Are the Key The three witches in Macbeth are the key to the stories turn of events. They control the lives and destiny of every single character in the play. Everyone’s lives in this play wouldn’t have been as drastically changed if it wasn’t for the witches and their deceptive fortune telling. Actually, it should be called, â€Å"misfortune telling†. Ever since Macbeth returned from his battle, he was intrigued by the witche’s call that he would soon be King. â€Å"All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be King hereafter.† (I.iii.50). The greed and pre-planning of his future rule was already taking place in Macbeth’s mind. Macbeth might have even been able to accept his rule more gracefully if the witches wouldn’t have been so vague in their predictions. Macbeth had to act on a whim, guessing what he had to do next, when he receives his title. Murder and lying clearly weren’t the right solutions to Macbeths future successes. Towards the end, after several â€Å"misfortune telling† from the hags, the gave Macbeth another hint, or tip. The second apparition said, â€Å"Be bloody, bold, and resolute! Laugh to scorn the power of man, for none of woman born shall harm Macbeth.† (IV.i.80-82). This only added to Macbeth’s excessive greed and willingness to stop anyone that’s poses a threat to his advance in the hierarchy. The apparition also ceases Macbeth’s ability to think things through. He did not realize that there are some people that aren’t born to conventional methods. This sure did kick the last leg out from under Macbeth’s not so sturdy table. Macbeth’s death shows that the witches were some bad dudes. Should they have been trusted? I guess so, but Macbeth’s actions were clearly traveling faster than his mind could think. Bad, bad witches they were.... Free Essays on MacBeth Macbeth Essay – Is Macbeth A Tragic Hero Tragic Hero – Someone who by a weakness of character brings about their own downfall. By this definition Macbeth is a tragic hero. It is Macbeth’ s ‘vaulting ambition’ that lead him to his downfall. It clouds his judgement and eventually he grows into a evil and cruel man who doesn’t care if he kills anyone. At the start of the play we hear about how noble and brave Macbeth is. In the next scene Macbeth meets the witches who give him the prophecies. Then when the first of these comes true and Macbeth is made Thane of Cawdor, Macbeth is shocked. His mind soon turns to murder but at this moment in the he is repelled by the idea and will not interfere with fate. ‘If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me, without my stir’. But later, when Macbeth hears that the Malcolm is named as the heir to the throne, Macbeth's thoughts turn to Murder again because he now thinks that he should be king. ‘The Prince of Cumberland! That is a step, which I must fall down or else o-er- leap, For it lies in my way. Star’s hide your fires! Let light not see my deep and dark desires’. This shows that aspiration to become king clouds his judgement and he eventually kills King Duncan. Macbeth's ambitions also turn him against his best friend. Banquo knows how ambitious Macbeth is and ends up suspecting that he murdered Kind Duncan: ‘Thou hast it now: King, Cawdor, Glamis, all, as the weird women promis’d; and, I fear, Thou play’dst most foully for’t’ When Macbeth becomes king he realises that the witches prophecies about Banquo might also come true: When they first put the name of king on me, and bade speak to ;then prophet- like, They’d hailed him father to a line of kings, Upon my head they’d placed a fruitless crown. He convinces the two murders that Banquo was their enemy and sends them to kill Banquo and Fleance. Ambition also tore apa... Free Essays on Macbeth MacBeth A tragedy is a literary work in which the main character is brought to ruin or suffers extreme sorrow, especially as a consequence of a tragic flaw and a moral weakness. William Shakespeare’s Macbeth is an example of such work. In this drama we discover that Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are, in fact, tragic characters in that they suffer to a greater extent than their misdeeds and their ultimate come to ruin and complete destruction further defines them as tragic figures. A prosperous and powerful warrior, Macbeth was respected by soldiers and commoners alike. King Duncan of Scotland, Macbeth’s brother, highly valued and appreciated Macbeth’s fearless warfare accomplishments. Duncan expressed gratitude by honoring his brother with the Thane of Cawdor and saying â€Å"more is thy due than more than all can pay†(1.4, line 24). Despite this, Macbeth became incredibly ambitious to become king when he discovered that King Duncan named his eldest son, Malcolm, the heir to the crown of Scotland. This envy lead Macbeth along with his wife, Lady Macbeth, to attempt to â€Å"o’erleap† Duncan’s appointment of the next king by committing numerous of dreadful murders. Although Macbeth reaches his objective, he is thrown into pool of insecurity, guilt, and paranoia. Lady Macbeth, Macbeth’s â€Å"dearest partner of greatness†(1.5, line 11), has greater ambition and desire to make her husband king. The play illustrates that although they both think of murdering King Duncan as soon as they hear the witches' prophecies, Macbeth thinks more about what he may or may not do, whereas Lady Macbeth immediately appeals to evil spirits to give her the strength to kill Duncan. Upon Macbeth refusal to proceed with the plan Lady Macbeth pressures her husband to commit the murder and states: â€Å"and live a coward in thine own esteem†(1.7, line 47). After the assassination of Duncan is complete, Lady Macbeth acquires the highest position ... Free Essays on Macbeth In MacBeth, William Shakespeare sets the mood of the entire play with extraordinary occurrences in the natural world. They signify the dark, cold and demented manner of MacBeth’s killing spree. From the thunder and lightning that accompany the three witches’ appearances to the terrible storms that follow the murders of King Duncan and Banquo. The supernatural occurrences reflect a break in the Chain of Being, the corruption in the moral and political orders that are considered unimaginable. Therefore, the supernatural occurrences in the natural world order are most severe and unsettling when that Chain of Being is broken. The three witches are an unnatural phenomenon and are directly related to the supernatural occurrences, this reflects their link to an unsettled and chaotic natural world. The sense of violence and foreboding that is evoked by the unnatural imagines create an aura of darkness, deception, and horror seen throughout MacBeth. The darkness creates th e image of horror with the deaths’ of King Duncan and Banquo at night or in darkness, and the second meeting with the three witches in a dark place shows the horror yet to come. The unnatural scenes in MacBeth are central to the foreshadowing of what is to come of MacBeth’s actions. The first three scenes establish a dark, gloomy mood that permeates the entire play. The play begins with a storm, and the supernatural forces immediately appear in the form of the three witches. The three witches are wicked and sinister, and whenever they appear the play links them to unease and lurking chaos in the natural world by insisting on thunder or thunder and lightning. The first witch says, â€Å"When shall we three meet again? In thunder, lightning, or in rain?† This gives the impression that whenever there is thunder, lightning, or rain that the witches are lurking in the â€Å"fog and filthy air† (I.i.13). In his description of MacBeth and Banquo’s heroics th... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth- - God or a Power-hungry Mortal? â€Å"†¦I go and it is done. The bell invites me. Hear it not, Duncan, for it is a knell That summons thee to heaven, or to hell.† (II, i, 71-73) â€Å"†¦It is concluded. Banquo, thy soul’s flight, If it find heaven, must find it out tonight.† (III, i, 157-158) â€Å"†¦Only for them, and mine eternal jewel Given to the common enemy of man To make them kings, the seed of Banquo kings! Rather than so, come, Fate, into the list, And champion me to the utterance! Who’s there?† (III, i, 72-76) In the first passage, Macbeth was preparing to kill King Duncan. The toll of the bell was a signal used in order to show Macbeth that she had taken care of the guards and the coast was clear to kill Duncan. As he neared Duncan’s room, he silently prayed that Duncan wouldn’t hear the bell, for it was an omen for his death. Even worse, Duncan lead an innocent life, yet Macbeth still wondered whether Duncan would go to heaven or hell. In the second passage, he once again wondered whether his innocent friend would go to heaven or hell, once again playing god. In the third passage listed above, Macbeth acted very selfish. He explained why he didn’t want to give up a throne that he worked so hard for, up to children that weren’t even of his blood. The reason he was expecting the children that weren’t of his blood was because it was prophesized by the witches. In response, he decided to defy fate so that it wouldn’t interrupt his vaulting ambition. These passages show how power-hungry Macbeth was, obviously revealing that he felt that he was equal to God. First, he judged people for where they would be in the afterlife, even though it was God’s duty, and only God’s duty. Macbeth had absolutely no right and not even close to enough power to assume God’s responsibility. He had enough audacity to do this not only once, but twice. Another time that Macbeth w... Free Essays on Macbeth Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a very dark play. The first of the play introduces readers to the importance of darkness. Throughout the play most key events occur at night, often in dark and gloomy places. I think the â€Å"darkness† in the play was used to make the plot more interesting. The very first scene takes place in the middle of a thunderstorm. The three witches are calling to each other through the storm, and preparing to meet Macbeth. The witches create a dark force over the play. Shakespeare used nature as darkness. Nature behaves in frightening and strange ways in the play. In the first act, Lady Macbeth reads a letter that Macbeth wrote her. He tells her in the letter that he is now the thane of Cawdor. Then, the messenger tells Lady Macbeth that king Duncan is coming to her castle. At that point, Lady Macbeth invites â€Å"darkness† and evil to come live in her. She wants Macbeth to kill Duncan, so he can become the kind of Scotland. Macbeth tells her no, that he can’t kill Duncan, because he has been good to him. The â€Å"darkness† and evil inside of her persuades Macbeth to go through with her plan and kill Duncan. The â€Å"darkness† starts to take over Macbeth. In the second act, Macbeth sees a dagger in front of him, with the handle turned toward his hand. He can see it, but he can’t touch it. The dagger guides Macbeth to Duncan’s room. Duncan is asleep, and his servants are drunk, because Lady Macbeth drugged their wine. Macbeth kills Duncan with the daggers. Then, he comes down with the daggers still in his hands. Macbeth is in shock with what he has just done. The â€Å"darkness† inside him overpowered the goodness. Lady Macbeth takes the daggers from him, to go smear the servants with the blood, so it appears that they killed Duncan. Macbeth doesn’t know what is happening to him. He is terrified about what he just did. Then someone knocks at the door. Lady Macbeth tells him they need to go change cloths an... Free Essays on Macbeth â€Å"Cowards die many times before their death.† Macbeth displayed many noticeable characteristics throughout Shakespeare’s play of the same name. He was courageous at times and cowardly at others. The most noticeable characteristic in Macbeth was his ambition throughout the play. He also seemed to be a moral coward as he depended on others more than himself to make decisions. His cowardly ambition soon lead to his tragic death at the end of the play. At the beginning of Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth was described very clearly as a hero. In the opening scenes he was very loyal to the king, and then grows very ambitious to be the king. This is shown in the quotation â€Å"If chance will have me king, why / chance may crown me / Without my stir.† His ambition to be king dissolved his good nature and morality. When Duncan arrives at Inverness, Macbeth controlled his ambition for the time being and thought very firmly on the plotting of Duncan’s murder. Lady Macbeth stated, â€Å"My hands are of your color; but I shame / To wear a heart so white.† MacBeth being called a coward changed his ambition, then soon after the murder was taking place. After the successful murder of Duncan, Macbeth entered a life of evil. Ambition was also clearly stated when he thought of killing his friend Banquo to protect the kingship. The witches’ predictions sent Macbeth into his own world where he could not be stopped on his way to becoming king. Macbeth overcame his personal matters to plot the death of the king. In the scene where the murder of Duncan is taking place, he shows he is a coward when he will not complete the successful murder by taking the daggers back and placing them with the guards. This also showed a sense of insecurity, as Macbeth seemed no longer confident in the success of the murder. Macbeth, who no longer needed any encouragement from Lady Macbeth, started to leave her to deploy his plans. The power of ... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth’s Tragic Flaw Every one has a character flaw. Some are more serious than others. For instance, some people pick their nose, while others drink milk directly from the carton. After a while a person’s character flaws will come back to haunt them. Shakespeare is a master at pointing out one’s character flaws and showing how those flaw bring down that person or society in general. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth he does just that. Macbeth is a tragic hero whose character flaws are ambition and avarice. The play opens with Macbeth, a popular noble who quells a military coup against the King of Scotland by a Scottish nobleman, Macdonwald. This is looked at by other nobles as and honorable deed. The King then gives Macbeth the late Macdonwald’s former title. In this instance ambition is a good thing: but alls to week for brave Macbeth – well he deserves that name (I ii 16). The king even said â€Å"O valiant cousin! Worthy gentleman†(I ii 24). His ambition was use to do a good thing, but if you stop to think; would any of this happened had he not killed Macdonwald. In the next scene we see the witches doing things that witches like to do. Then enters Macbeth with Banquo. They spot the witches and Banquo insults them. The witches turn to Macbeth and tell him he will be king: All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter (I iii 50). That single line is what sparks Maspeth’s evil ambition. This is the also the point when Macbeth start to turn evil. The witches also tell Macbeth he will become Thane of Cawdor. Macbeth replies to all this: to be king stands not within the prospect of belief (I iii 75). At this point Macbeth is skeptical, but then Ross tells him he is thane of Cawdor. Macbeth starts to believe he can become king. He is now successor to the throne of Scotland. Since Macbeth is heir to the throne of Scotland, all he has to do is get rid of King Duncan. In scene IV Duncan names his son the Prince o... Free Essays on Macbeth Greed of One Man At the end of the play, Malcolm refers to Macbeth and Lady Macbeth as: â€Å"Of this dead butcher and his fiend-like queen† (Act V Scene VII line 69), consider the accuracy of Malcolm's judgment by reference to their speeches and actions throughout the play. In Malcolm's eyes, Macbeth is just a tyrannical murderer who snatched the throne away from him and his father and reigned a rule of terror in all of Scotland. Looking carefully from a different point-of-view, we see that Macbeth is driven by the powerful contradictions in his character. Unlike other villains, Macbeth does not enjoy doing evil; he has not totally renounced the idea of morality, although it is apparent that his ambition is stronger than his conscience. At first, Macbeth had the itch to be king, but he did not have the will to scratch it. We can see that Macbeth is not a cold-blooded monster in that the very idea of killing Duncan horrifies him, and in Act II he tries to tell Lady Macbeth that he will not go through with the murder. The character of Lady Macbeth is therefore required to provide Macbeth with the extra will power to fulfill his royal ambitions. Macbeth is almost 'forced' by Lady Macbeth to murder Duncan. After committing the murder, Macbeth seems almost delirious and he says, "Will all great Neptune's ocean wash this blood clean from my hand" (Act II Scene III Lines 59-60). We can already see that he is sorry for what he has done. When Macbeth orders Banquo's murder, he is still in torment, but the cause of his anguish seems to have been changed. He is afraid of Banquo, because Banquo knows about the witches and their predictions of his descendants being kings. Banquo's death, he says, will put his mind at rest. Banqu o's murder, he figures, will serve as an aspirin to his aches and pains. We are never told how Macbeth feels about the murder of Macduff's wife and children. Their killing gains him nothing. He has good reason to fear Ma... Free Essays on Macbeth Bloody Macbeth The story â€Å"The Tragedy of Macbeth† by William Shakespeare begins in a mythical way. It first scene is an open place in Scotland where three witches have met. They tell the main character Macbeth that he will become king. This weighs on his mind, and he kills the present reigning king, Duncan. He becomes king, and many people become suspicious of him. An uprising is held against him where he is killed, and the son of King Duncan is crowned. The many conflicts in the story lead to the frequent use of blood. The use of blood adds to the effect of the story. Lady Macbeth speaking of blood after she learns she will be queen adds to the effect of the story. After the witches tell Macbeth he will be crowned at the first of the story, he writes a letter to his wife, telling her what he has heard. She begins to see that she has the chance to become the Queen of Scotland, and she must do anything possible to make it happen. She realizes that she must change as a person in order to do the things needed to become Queen. She begins to speak of herself, and the changes she must undergo to become the cruel person she needs to. She wants her blood to thicken to make her more cold-hearted, â€Å"Make thick my blood, Stop up the access and passage to remorse.† Act I, sceneV, lines 43-44. This adds to the intensity of the story, by making it clear she wants to become different in any way needed in order to become. If the changing of the very blood of her body is necessary, then she is prepared for it to change, which strengthens the effect of the story. The blood mentioned in the plans to kill Duncan add the effect of the murder. Lady Macbeth is very intent on becoming Queen. She and Macbeth make a plan of how they will kill King Duncan. They plan to kill him in his own chamber, with the daggers of his to guards, after the guards have been drugged. When the king is dead, and the guards... Free Essays on Macbeth Macbeth Essay: Many Feel Lady Macbeth is to Blame for Macbeth ¡Ã‚ ¦s Failure, Agree or Disagree? Lady Macbeth was not to blame for Macbeth ¡Ã‚ ¦s failure in this tragedy because it was Macbeth ¡Ã‚ ¦s ambition which leaded him to his downfall instead of Lady Macbeth ¡Ã‚ ¦s persuasion, nobody could force anyone to do anything which he didn ¡Ã‚ ¦t want to unless Macbeth himself really wanted to do so and also, Lady Macbeth felt guilty and regretted at the end to show her human kindness, but Macbeth didn ¡Ã‚ ¦t. At the beginning of the story we learned that Macbeth was a very superstition person who believed in the prophecies of the evil witches. He was also a person full of ambition who wanted to take over the kingship of King Duncan. Those two characteristics were the main concern of his failure. Lady Macbeth had never met or known anything about the witches because Macbeth had never mentioned it before. So Lady Macbeth was not involved in Macbeth ¡Ã‚ ¦s  ¡Ã‚ §evil plan ¡Ã‚ ¨. Before we had met Lady Macbeth in the play, we had already known that Macbeth had the thinking of taking over the kingship from Duncan. This showed that to murder Duncan was not suggested by Lady Macbeth but, instead, Macbeth was the one who came up with this idea first. Later on, Macbeth decided to kill Banquo as well as Macduff ¡Ã‚ ¦s family. Lady Macbeth never known that Macbeth had became such a ruthless person. She didn ¡Ã‚ ¦t persuade Macbeth to do these murders so we couldn ¡Ã‚ ¦t blame on her. On the other hand, I believed that nobody could force anyone to do something unless the person himself really wanted to do so. Even through Lady Macbeth had persuaded Macbeth to kill Duncan but she never do anything to force him. She only accused Macbeth of his inconstancy, cowardice and unmanliness. It was Macbeth who couldn ¡Ã‚ ¦t stand the accusation and decided to do something wrong. Macbeth ¡Ã‚ ¦s lack of loyalty and patriotism was the main causes of his murder to Dun... Free Essays on MacBeth In reading Shakespeare’’s well-known play, Macbeth, one will always notice the many influences that Macbeth encounters before his downfall. Each one of these may have had some bit of impact on the final outcome. The three most controversial and popular causes of the tragedy of Macbeth are the main character’’s ambition, the witches’’ fateful prophecies, and Lady Macbeth’’s dominance. Each one of these can be argued as the main source of influence on Macbeth for murdering so many people. Some people would argue that the main source causing this tragedy was his wife, Lady Macbeth. However, this would not support all of the events that took place in Macbeth. Other people might argue that Macbeth’’s own, personal ambition is what led to the bloody death of so many people, but in this case, it is obvious that there was some other force behind him that helped him to change from a respectable, trustworthy man, to a deceiv ing murderer. In his encounters with the witches, Macbeth was introduced to that fact that he could have more power, and in hearing what he had to do to earn it, he was scared. However, with the witches making this power sound so grand, he was eventually convinced that his dignity was no longer essential. The witches, therefore, were what caused the legacy of Macbeth as a heroic individual to lead to his ultimate death and destruction. In the play, there are many interesting sections that concentrate on the suspense and the involvement of the supernatural. With the sense of the supernatural and interference of the spirits, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are led to dangerous, tempting things. The three witches are introduced right at the beginning of the play, on Macbeth’’s way home from fighting in the battle for his country. They recount to Macbeth three prophecies. The first is that he will become the Thane of Cawdor, the second is the Thane of Glamis, which he already was titled as, and the third was sta...